Articles
By Frank Tyler
John 9:5-10:42
Introduction
John 9:5-10:21: Mid-Day—Evening
As you and I shall see in this third and last article in our series, As long as I am in the world, I am the light of the world (John 9:5) sums up for Yeshua’s disciples both His previous ministry in the temple and His continuing ministry in an unnamed synagogue local to the environs of Jerusalem. The light of the world, God’s Menorah, loves the very ones who seek His life, the hardened unbelieving Judean authorities. He has sought them diligently with His Word (John 8:12-8:59), but now in the face of all the ongoing threats against His life, with a sign only Messiah could perform, Yeshua continues to reach out to the Judean authorities by healing a man born blind. [1]
Once healed, the man born blind becomes an ambassador of light and life—eternal life—reflecting Yeshua’s lovingkindness, judgment, and righteousness (Jeremiah 9:24) to the Pharisees and rulers. How will they respond to their Messiah through the words of this most unlikely of ambassadors? Will their eyes and ears be opened to Messiah? Will the light of world penetrate the darkness of hardened unbelief?
John 10:22-42: Sixty-Two Days Later
Beginning in the early morning with the woman caught in adultery, the long and grueling day eventually draws to a close with the Judean authorities once again divided.
10:20 And many of them said, “He has a demon and is mad. Why do you listen to Him?”
10:21 Others said, “These are not the words of one who has a demon. Can a demon open the eyes of the blind?” (John 10:20-21)
Nevertheless, the apologias and signs given by Yeshua on that long and grueling day, continue to percolate in minds and hearts of the Judean authorities 62 days later on the day of Dedication. If He so leads, are you and I willing to be shunned and cast out for sharing good news? If so, we may find our Lord’s witness continuing to fulfill its purpose days, weeks and even months later in those with whom we have shared.
A Miracle and Witness Reserved for Messiah
The Cruelty of Sin and Death
The time may be mid-day, but the cruelties of sin and death abound timelessly in a fallen world, no more transparently so, than in a child born with a serious birth defect.
9:1 Now as Jesus passed by, He saw a man who was blind from birth.
9:2 And His disciples asked Him, saying, “Rabbi, who sinned, this man or his parents, that he was born blind?” (John 9:1-2)
The disciples’ question reflects a common theological understanding: 1) the parent’s sin might be visited upon their child through a birth defect (Exodus 34:6-7), or 2) the fetus might have sinned while in the womb.
According to Pharisaic Judaism, at the point of conception, the fetus has two inclinations. In Hebrew, they are called yetzer hara, which means “the evil inclination,” and the yetzer hatov, “the good inclination.”… During that nine-month development within the womb of the mother, there is a struggle going on for control between the two inclinations. (If) at one point, the evil inclination got the better of the fetus; and, in a state of animosity or anger toward his mother, he kicked his mother in the womb. For this act of sin, this act of animosity, he was born blind. [2]
Yeshua corrects both of these misunderstandings and relates the man’s infirmity to His continuing work as the light of the world:
9:3 …“Neither this man nor his parents sinned, but that the works of God should be revealed in him.
9:4 I must work the works of Him who sent Me while it is day; the night is coming when no one can work.
9:5 As long as I am in the world, I am the light of the world .”
(John 9:3-5; underlining added)
Not only will the man born without sight miraculously receive his sight, but he will also serve as Yeshua’s ambassador to the Pharisees and rulers of a local synagoguethat the works of God should be revealed in him.
The Wonder of Healing
No one had ever received sight after being born blind; healing this man is a Messianic miracle, a special and utterly definitive calling card. [3] The initial stir of the crowd rightly reveals their wonder.
9:8 Therefore the neighbors and those who previously had seen that he was blind said, “Is not this he who sat and begged?”
9:9 Some said, “This is he.” Others said, “He is like him.” He said, “I am he.”
9:10 Therefore they said to him, “How were your eyes opened?”
9:11 He answered and said, “A Man called Jesus made clay and anointed my eyes and said to me, ‘Go to the pool of Siloam and wash.’ So I went and washed, and I received sight.”
9:12 Then they said to him, “Where is He?” He said, “I do not know.”
Imagine this exchange among those witnessing the miracle. If fishermen from Galilee can know the theology of the Pharisees regarding birth defects, then might those witnessing this miracle know the teaching of the Pharisees regarding miracles only Messiah could perform? Indeed! Imagine the anticipation and excitement when witnessing the wonder of a man born-blind seeing for the first time. That a great act of compassion and healing has taken place among them stirs the crowd to seek authentication from those whose leadership they rely on: They brought him who formerly was blind to the Pharisees (John 9:13). Could the One who healed the formerly blind man be their long-awaited Messiah?
An Interrogation—not a Celebration
The healing of the man born blind should be a source of celebration and praise for God’s mercy and more importantly an authentication of Yeshua as Messiah. Glory to God! A man born blind has been healed? Hallelujah! Messiah is here!!! How will the authorities respond?
Perhaps a few of these Pharisees had failed to witness some of Yeshua’s many signs, yet surely they heard reports from their colleagues; perhaps, some of these Pharisees had not heard Him preach the message of eternal life, yet surely they had heard His words through colleagues like Nicodemus and if not this teacher of Israel himself, then his disciples.
9:14 Now it was a Sabbath when Jesus made the clay and opened his eyes.
9:15 Then the Pharisees also asked him again how he had received his sight. He said to them, “He put clay on my eyes, and I washed, and I see.”
9:16 Therefore some of the Pharisees said, “This Man is not from God,
because He does not keep the Sabbath.” Others said, “ How can a man who is a sinner do such signs?” And there was a division among them .
(John 9:14-16; underlining added)
So powerful and definitive is this Messianic miracle that it causes an immediate division among them: How can a man who is a sinner do such signs ?” What will it take to open the eyes of the leadership to the One True God and His Messiah?
The inquiry continues filled with innuendos and doubt, all without a scintilla of rejoicing for a man who had lived his life, up until Yeshua’s intercession, living in darkness while begging on the streets.
9:17 They said to the blind man again, “What do you say about Him because He opened your eyes?” He said, “He is a prophet.”
9:18 But the Jews did not believe concerning him, that he had been blind and received his sight, until they called the parents of him who had received his sight. (John 9:17-18; underlining added)
Imagine the humiliation of this man witnessing to the truth of his miraculous healing only to have His parents called forth by the leadership of Israel in hopes of contradicting his testimony. Imagine parents so fearful of being cast out of the synagogue that when verifying that the man is indeed their son, they fail to openly rejoice in his healing (John 9:19-21). Imagine leaders so prejudiced against Yeshua that they remain set upon condemnation regardless of the evidence, for the Jews had agreed already that if anyone confessed that He was Christ, he would be put out of the synagogue (John 9:22; underlining added). The blind man may see, but darkness—not joy—abounds.
In the healing of the man born blind, the Pharisees have ample reason to glorify God, but instead they command the absurd: Give God the glory! We know that this Man is a sinner (John 9:24). Arnold Fruchtenbaum rightly notes, “This is not something to praise God for. It is a sad thing when people commit specific acts of sin.” [4] So prejudiced is the leadership that even the formerly blind man, acting as an ambassador for Yeshua, is forced to correct the Judean authorities.
9:25 He answered and said, “ Whether He is a sinner or not I do not know. One thing I know: that though I was blind, now I see.”
9:26 Then they said to him again, “What did He do to you? How did He open your eyes?”
9:27 He answered them, “I told you already, and you did not listen. Why do you want to hear it again? Do you also want to become His disciples?” (John 9:25-27; underlining added)
Once again, the Pharisees fail to judge righteously (John 7:21-24) and remain deaf even to the words of this ambassador.
What ought to have been a time of rejoicing in the goodness and mercy of God in healing the man born blind and in confirming Yeshua as Messiah is now mired in senseless legalism: 1) Yeshua performed this definitive Messianic miracle on the Sabbath; 2) Only sinners perform work on the Sabbath; therefore, 3) Messiah is a sinner.
9:28 Then they reviled him and said, “You are His disciple, but we are Moses’ disciples.
9:29 We know that God spoke to Moses; as for this fellow, we do not know where He is from.” (John 9:28-29; underlining added)
The man born blind becomes righteously indignant and openly rebukes the Pharisees for their calloused behavior and astonishing blindness.
9:30 … “Why, this is a marvelous thing, that you do not know where He is from; yet He has opened my eyes!
9:31 Now we know that God does not hear sinners; but if anyone is a worshiper of God and does His will, He hears him.
9:32 Since the world began it has been unheard of that anyone opened the eyes of one who was born blind.
9:33 If this Man were not from God, He could do nothing.”
Unfettered by legalism, the man born blind knows his healing is a miraculous sign only Israel’s Messiah can perform: Since the world began it has been unheard of that anyone opened the eyes of one who was born blind (John 9:32). Though he has yet to set eyes on Yeshua personally, he already believes in Him as Messiah.
The Curse of Cherem
Yeshua’s ambassador presents his healing as a definitive calling card; How will the Judean authorities conclude their interrogation? They answered and said to him, “You were completely born in sins, and are you teaching us?” And they cast him out (John 9:34; underlining added).
Dr. Fruchtenbaum describes the meaning of being cast out as excommunication. At the least, it means “hezipah… a rebuke that lasted anywhere from seven to thirty days;” for a more serious judgment, a niddui is issued for a minimum of thirty days. [5] For the most serious offense, a cherem is executed:
The third and worst type of excommunication is called the cherem, which means to be “un-synagogued.” To “be put out of the synagogue and to be separated from the Jewish community.” The rest of the Jews considered someone under the cherem curse to be dead, and no communication or any kind of relationship whatsoever could be carried on with the person. [6]
According to Fruchtenbaum, the expression be put out of the synagogue (John 9:22) reveals that the rulers placed this man under the curse of cherem for confessing Yeshua as Christ.
From the darkness and isolation of being born blind—to the briefest of public celebrations for his miraculous healing and discovery of Messiah—to being an ambassador and faithful witness to the truth of Yeshua’s Messiahship… he must now face the wrath of his interrogators who, rather than celebrate God’s goodness and mercy, condemn him to the darkness and isolation of cherem.
The Judean authorities’ reign of terror over God’s flock contrasts starkly with God’s Menorah, the light of the world (John 8:12, 9:5) the One who delights in lovingkindness, judgment, and righteousness (Jeremiah 9:24).
9:35 Jesus heard that they had cast him out; and when He had found him, He said to him, “Do you believe in the Son of God?”
9:36 He answered and said, “Who is He, Lord, that I may believe in Him?”
9:37 And Jesus said to him, “You have both seen Him and it is He who is talking with you.”
9:38 Then he said, “Lord, I believe!” And he worshiped Him.
(John 9:35-38; underlining added)
Cast out of the synagogue into the waiting arms of His Lord and Savior, the man born blind sees, believes in, and openly worships the Son of God.
An Open and Necessary Rebuke
Judgment and Righteousness
Though His lovingkindness or chesed seemingly knows no bounds, as God, Yeshua must also exercise judgment and righteousness; He must correct the Pharisees for their calloused and arrogant treatment of the man, his parents and those who witnessed the man’s interrogation. Afterall, God has entrusted these leaders to shepherd His flock.
9:39 And Jesus said, “For judgment I have come into this world, that those who do not see may see, and that those who see may be made blind.”
9:40 Then some of the Pharisees who were with Him heard these words, and said to Him, “Are we blind also?”
9:41 Jesus said to them, “If you were blind, you would have no sin; but now you say, ‘We see.’ Therefore your sin remains.
(John 9:39-41)
The man born blind now sees; the Pharisees and rulers, who see, have been made blind by their own spiritual intransigency… and knowingly so; therefore He reminds them that they see and their sin remains.
The Cost of Legalism
You and I might expect Yeshua to render a very harsh judgment against these rulers. From their false teaching regarding those with birth defects, to their calloused and harsh treatment of the man and his parents, to their refusal to acknowledge Him as Messiah, to their decision to excommunicate anyone who identifies with Yeshua—their penchant for legalism has cost them and those entrusted to their care dearly. They have failed miserably in their opportunity to serve as shepherds of God’s flock. Thankfully, Yeshua’s righteousness exceeds all expectations as He continues to reach out in love to Israel’s leadership.
First things first. The Pharisees must understand their failure in light of their treatment of the man born blind.
10:1 “Most assuredly, I say to you, he who does not enter the sheepfold by the door, but climbs up some other way, the same is a thief and a robber (Satan).
10:2 But he who enters by the door is the shepherd of the sheep (Yeshua).
10:3 To him the doorkeeper (the Father) opens, and the sheep (the man born blind) hear his voice (Yeshua, the shepherd of the sheep); and he calls his own sheep by name and leads them out.
10:4 And when he brings out his own sheep, he goes before them; and the sheep follow him, for they know his voice.
10:5 Yet they will by no means follow a stranger (Pharisees), but will flee from him, for they do not know the voice of strangers (Pharisees).”
10:6 Jesus used this illustration, but they did not understand the things which He spoke to them. (John 10:1-6; underlining added)
Satan is a thief and robber; God the Father is the doorkeeper ; Yeshua is the shepherd of the sheep; the man born blind represents the sheep who hear Yeshua’s voice and follow Him; the Pharisees are strangers whose voice the sheep do not know. Yeshua’s illustration summarizes the events and characters involved in the Pharisee’s interrogation of the man born blind.
Sadly, their entrenched legalism proves so costly they did not understand the things which He spoke to them (John 10:6).
Another Explanation and Invitation for Anyone to Enter
After a long and grueling day beginning at the crack of dawn with the Judean authorities’ senseless endangerment of the woman caught in adultery, you and I might all too reasonably kick the dust off our feet in exasperation and move on. Not so Yeshua. The deep abiding love or lovingkindness (chesed) of God looks like something as He once again pursues the Pharisees.
10:7 Then Jesus said to them again, “Most assuredly, I say to you, I am the door of the sheep (Yeshua).
10:8 All who ever came before Me are thieves and robbers (Satan and his minions), but the sheep (God’s flock) did not hear them.
10:9 I am the door (Yeshua). If anyone enters by Me, he will be saved, and will go in and out and find pasture.
10:10 The thief (Satan) does not come except to steal, and to kill, and to destroy. I have come that they may have life, and that they may have it more abundantly.
10:11 “ I am the good shepherd (Yeshua). The good shepherd gives His life for the sheep.
10:12 But a hireling (Pharisees), he who is not the shepherd, one who does not own the sheep, sees the wolf (the enemy of the sheep, Satan/Rome) coming and leaves the sheep and flees; and the wolf catches the sheep and scatters them.
10:13 The hireling flees because he is a hireling and does not care about the sheep.
10:14 I am the good shepherd; and I know My sheep, and am known by My own. (John 10:7-14; underlining added)
The Father remains the doorkeeper, but now Yeshua casts Himself as the door of the sheep. Satan and his minions remain thieves and robbers . The sheep are God’s flock represented by the woman caught in adultery, the man born blind, his parents and the crowds. Satan is the thief; Yeshua, the good shepherd; the Pharisees, hirelings ; lastly, the wolf , the enemy of the sheep in particular Rome. Can the rich history of shepherding in Israel and its metaphorical use within the Bible, bring these Pharisees to understand their failure?
Surely, Yeshua’s words evoke the woes pronounced upon Israel’s shepherds by the Prophet Ezekiel: The weak you have not strengthened, nor have you healed those who were sick, nor bound up the broken, nor brought back what was driven away, nor sought what was lost; but with force and cruelty you have ruled them (Ezekiel 34:4; underlining added). The Pharisees and other Judean authorities rule over Israel not as shepherds, but as hirelings dependent on and in fear of Rome. They do not rejoice in the healing of the paralytic (John 5:1-9), show compassion on the woman caught in adultery, or glorify God for the man born blind (John 9:1-7), but instead, as hirelings, with force and cruelty they ruleover God’s flock. Afterall, the woman was caught in adultery, both of the miraculous healings were performed in violation of their Sabbath laws, and worse yet, the man born blind openly acknowledges and defends Yeshua, the One they condemn as a sinner.Small wonder that in the face of such legalism and cruelty, God’s flock scatters and flees into the diaspora… So they were scattered because there was no shepherd; and they became food for all the beasts of the field when they were scattered (Ezekiel 34:5).
Astoundingly, Yeshua continues to invite the Judean authorities to enter in by Him: If anyone enters by Me, he will be saved, and will go in and out and find pasture (John10:9; underlining added). Anyone includes those who have just cast out the man born blind from the synagogue… that they may have life and that they may have it more abundantly (John 10:10). Emphatically, as Yeshua’s continued pursuit of them reveals, the Judean authorities, Pharisees, and rulers, who fail so miserably in shepherding God’s flock… who flee in the face of Rome and instead seek to kill the good shepherd (John 11:45-50), can both know and be known by their Messiah (John 10:14). Oh, the bottomless depths of God’s great love, His judgment, and His righteousness!
The Power to Lay Down His Life and Take It Again
Who will rescue God’s sheep? Who will deliver them from their dispirited and lost estate? Only Yeshua: As the Father knows Me, even so I know the Father; and I lay down My life for the sheep (John 10:15).
10:16 And other sheep (Jews in the diaspora; John 11:51-52)) I have which are not of this fold; them also I must bring, and they will hear My voice; and there will be one flock and one shepherd.
10:17 “Therefore My Father loves Me, because I lay down My life that I may take it again.
10:18 No one takes it from Me, but I lay it down of Myself. I have power to lay it down, and I have power to take it again. This command I have received from My Father.”
(John 10:16-18; underlining added)
Yeshua is the Father’s Son and Israel’s Messiah who alone has power to lay down His life and then take it up again. It is hard to imagine these Pharisees and rulers unfamiliar with the Messianic overtones of Yeshua’s words. Consider the Prophet Ezekiel:
34:12 As a shepherd seeks out his flock on the day he is among his scattered sheep, so will I seek out My sheep and deliver them from all the places where they were scattered on a cloudy and dark day.
34:13 And I will bring them out from the peoples and gather them from the countries, and will bring them to their own land; I will feed them on the mountains of Israel, in the valleys and in all the inhabited places of the country.
(Ezekiel 34:1-3; underlining added)
According to the Prophet Jeremiah, God’s flock—so badly scattered—will be regathered to their own land by none other than Messiah, THE LORD OUR RIGHTEOUSNESS (Jeremiah 23:1-8). And, what is the response, but division again among the Judeans (John 10:19).
10:20 And many of them said, “He has a demon and is mad. Why do you listen to Him?”
10:21 Others said, “These are not the words of one who has a demon. Can a demon open the eyes of the blind?”
(John 10:19-21)
The One who has the supernatural power to both lay down and take up His life offers freely the gift of eternal life and life more abundantly to hirelings without ears to hear Him, to those who would just as likely kill Him to preserve their place with Rome (John 11:47-53).
The Fruit of a Perfect Promise
A Continuing Apologia
The Apostle John provides a time marker (John 10:22) to remind his readers that the long day, which began with the accusations against the woman caught in adultery, has finally drawn to a close. From the Feast of Tabernacles to the Feast of Dedication (John 10:22) 62 days [7] transpire, but curiously Yeshua’s previous signs and apologia to the Pharisees continue to peak their curiosity.
10:24 Then the Jews surrounded Him and said to Him, “How long do You keep us in doubt? If You are the Christ, tell us plainly .”
10:25 Jesus answered them, “ I told you, and you do not believe. The works that I do in My Father’s name, they bear witness of Me.
(John 10:22-25; underlining added)
That Yeshua picks up upon the theme from His previous apologia I am the good shepherd , reveals that the dialogue between the Judean authorities and their Messiah has remained both active and, as you and I will soon learn, productive.
10:26 But you do not believe, because you are not of My sheep, as I said to you.
10:27 My sheep hear My voice, and I know them, and they follow Me.
10:28 And I give them eternal life, and they shall never perish; neither shall anyone snatch them out of My hand.
10:29 My Father, who has given them to Me, is greater than all; and no one is able to snatch them out of My Father’s hand.
10:30 I and My Father are one.”
(John 10:26-30; underlining added)
That Yeshua says you are not of My sheep… My sheep hear my voice (John 10:16-27) reflects a larger truth He has already revealed to the Pharisees: Why do you not understand My speech? Because you are not able to listen to My word (John 8:43)… He who is of God hears God’s words; therefore you do not hear, because you are not of God (John 8:47). Yeshua knows His sheep and they know Him and follow Him. [8] To the sheep Yeshua giveseternal life, and they shall never perish; neither shall anyone snatch them out of(His) hand (John 10:28).
The Response of a Loving God
The reaction of the Judean authorities to stone the Son of God should not surprise us (John 10:31), but His response must.
10:32 Jesus answered them, “Many good works I have shown you from My Father. For which of those works do you stone Me?”
10:33 The Jews answered Him, saying, “ For a good work we do not stone You, but for blasphemy, and because You, being a Man, make Yourself God.” (John 10:32-33; underlining added)
Ironically, the Pharisees’ own theology recognizes that only Messiah can heal a man born blind. After quoting Scripture to dispense with their accusation of blasphemy (John 10:34-36), Yeshua appeals to them to believe:
10:37 If I do not do the works of My Father, do not believe Me;
10:38 but if I do, though you do not believe Me, believe the works, that you may know and believe that the Father is in Me, and I in Him .”
(John 10:37-38; underlining added)
Once again, the response of a loving God remains utterly breathtaking: The Judean authorities accuse the Son of God of blasphemy and seek to stone Him; in turn, He graciously, but definitively, corrects their accusation from Scripture and then beseeches them to believe based, if not upon His Words, then upon His works that you may know and believe that the Father is in Me, and I in Him (John 10:38). Not a scintilla of hatred, scorn, or pride surface in Yeshua’s appeal to save the Judeans. He is the light of the world (John 8:12 and 9:5) who delights in lovingkindness, judgment, and righteousness (Jeremiah 9:24)!
Many Believed in Him
The Judean authorities respond to God’s love and grace by attempting to seize Yeshua, but He departs beyond the Jordan to the place where John was baptizing at first, and there He stayed (John 10:40). Miraculously, Yeshua’s ministry was not in vain:
10:41 Then many came to Him and said, “John performed no sign, but all the things that John spoke about this Man were true.”
10:42 And many believed in Him there.
(John 10:41-42; underlining added)
In the most unlikely of places and under the most improbable of circumstances, many followed after Yeshua beyond the Jordan and believed in Him. We might reasonably speculate that some were Pharisees and rulers. [9]
Conclusion
John 9:5-10:24: evening to 62 Days Later
Throughout a long and grueling day of ministry—beginning in the early morning, when confronted by the Judean authorities who purposefully jeopardize the life of a woman caught in adultery in order to publicly undermine His ministry, to the conclusion of the day when Yeshua blesses the man born blind with sight that the works of God may be manifest in him as an ambassador for Messiah—the Lamb of God (John 1:29), tested and true, has been found free of spot or blemish. Regarding His apologias, the light of the world shines brightly; the door remains open for all to enter and be saved; the good shepherd shepherds God’s flock, even the most troublesome of the flock, with perfect lovingkindness, judgment and righteousness , You and I may now conclude this three part series.
Jeremiah 9:24: Three Part Series
Yeshua’s interactions with the Judean authorities are often accounted as an extended series of arguments and discourses. Nothing could be farther from the truth. God does not argue or contend, but speaks His Word with perfect power and authority. He is the light of the world, the door , and the good shepherd… the Son who glorifies His Father by relentlessly pursuing even the most hardened unbelievers with both apologias and signs demonstrating His lovingkindness, judgment, and righteousness .
Yeshua is the Son who with the finger of God speaks the Word of God; He is the Spirit Filled Messiah who fulfills the Word of God perfectly. The dark malevolent motives and actions of the Judean authorities contrast vividly with the Son of God who openly glorifies and delights His Father:
But let him who glories glory in this,
That he understands and knows Me,
That I am the LORD, exercising lovingkindness, judgment, and righteousness in the earth.
For in these I delight,” says the LORD.
(Jeremiah 9:24)
The Son alone has perfect understanding and knowledge of His Father and tirelessly exercises a perfect balance of lovingkindness, judgment, and righteousness both in word and deed under the most trying of circumstances.
If this were just one exceptionally long and grueling day of ministry, you and I would be awed, as well His disciples no doubt were, but consider that this one day is not the exception, but rather the norm in a ministry spanning three years. Remember, Nicodemus and his disciples visited at night following Yeshua’s long day of ministry in the temple (John 2:23 through 3:21); the Samaritan woman drew water for a tired and thirsty Messiah determined to share living water with her and the whiten fields of men from Sychar (John 4:3-42); likewise, Yeshua fed a crowd of 5000 men with their women and children after a long day of ministry, continued into the evening with prayer, and then walked through a storm on the sea of Galilee to deliver His disciples and their boat safely to Capernaum (John 6:1-21). According to Yeshua, Foxes haveholes and birds of the air have nests, but the Son of Man has nowhere to lay His head (Matthew 8:20; Luke 9:58). The disciples observed Yeshua intimately for over three years navigate a relentless ministry schedule without sin, without flaw, without excuse, but with perfect lovingkindness, judgment, and righteousness . Yeshua declares, He who sent Me is with Me. The Father has not left Me alone, for I always do those things that please Him (John 8:29; underlining added). Again, you and I witness our Lord’s miraculous ministry through the eyes and ears of His apostles, a three-year-long ministry utterly routine for Him as the Christ, the Son of God.
Yeshua and His Father are One; He is the Christ, the Son of God who gives life in His name to those who believe in Him and His promise of eternal life. And, to believers who possess His perfect assurance of eternal life, the Apostle John declares:
1:1 That which was from the beginning, which we have heard, which we have seen with our eyes, which we have looked upon, and our hands have handled, concerning the Word of life—
1:2 the life was manifested, and we have seen, and bear witness, and declare to you that eternal life which was with the Father and was manifested to us—
1:3 that which we have seen and heard we declare to you, that you also may have fellowship with us; and truly our fellowship is with the Father and with His Son Jesus Christ.
1:4 And these things we write to you that your joy may be full.
1:5 This is the message which we have heard from Him and declare to you, that God is light and in Him is no darkness at all.
(1 John 1:1-5; underlining added)
The fellowship you and I are called to enjoy today as believers is a direct reflection of Yeshua’s person and ministry: I am the light of the world. He who follows Me shall not walk in darkness, but have the light of life … eternal life (John 8:12).
Lastly, consider that on the day of Dedication, sixty-two days after this long day of ministry concluded (John 10:22-42), the Judean authorities again sought Him out regarding His previous apologias and signs… and as a result some of them pursued Him beyond the Jordan and believed in Him. Despite all the persecution He endured… He never turned those who hated Him away! Sparing neither jot nor tittle, Yeshua’s Word goes out with perfect power and authority; as God’s Spirit filled Messiah He always fulfills His Word. His apologias and signs remain as persuasive today as they were two thousand years ago; His great love or chesednever fails.
Application
Despite what His accusers might think, Yeshua never pontificates, but instead loves and evangelizes those His Father brings into His path. Far from signifying failure, being confronted with impossible circumstances, being belittled and ignored, being shun and cast out and, even being threatened with death—on our longest and most grueling day—our persecution glorifies our Lord when we glory, not in our flesh, but in the knowledge of His lovingkindness, judgment, and righteousness. Indeed this is the great lesson the Apostle Peter learned so long ago.
3:13 And who is he who will harm you if you become followers of what is good?
3:14 But even if you should suffer for righteousness’ sake, you are blessed. “And do not be afraid of their threats, nor be troubled.”
3:15 But sanctify the Lord God in your hearts, and always be ready to give a defense to everyone who asks you a reason for the hope that is in you, with meekness and fear;
3:16 having a good conscience, that when they defame you as evildoers, those who revile your good conduct in Christ may be ashamed.
(1 Peter 3:13-16)
To sanctify the Lord God in your hearts is to esteem Yeshua’s person and example above unjust persecution and suffering by sharing His good news. In God’s economy, ambassadors who delight in God’s lovingkindness, judgment, and righteousness in their witness of Yeshua—regardless of outcome—will have followed their Messiah and one day soon know heavenly commendation and reward in His presence. Our Lord and Savior is the light of the world. He who follows Him shall not walk in darkness, but have the light of life… eternal life (John 8:12)!
Appendix A: A Long and Grueling Day of Ministry
Strategic repetition and similarity in language can signify unity and continuity in writing, particularly in narratives like the Gospel of John.
John 8:59 and John 9:1
The transition in question, John 8:59—John 9:1, occurs at a chapter break. Though extraordinarily useful, chapter and verse breaks were not a part of the original Greek text and can be misleading.
8:59 Then they took up stones to throw at Him; but Jesus hid Himself and went out of the temple, going through the midst of them, and so passed by (καὶ παρῆγεν οὕτως).
9:1 Now as Jesus passed by (Καὶ παράγων), He saw a man who was blind from birth. (John 8:59 and John 9:1; underlining added)
Of particular interest is the similarity of the Greek phrases translated and passed by: καὶ παρῆγεν (third person singular imperfect active indicative) and καὶ παράγων (present active participle masculine singular nominative). Do the similarities of these phrases point to a repetition of ideas and a strategic connection revealing the temporal continuation of the narrative on the same day Yeshua leaves the temple?
Craig Keener:
This narrative (conflict Over the Healing of a Blind Man: 9:1-10:21) demonstrates JESUS’ claims in the previous context and chronologically follows directly on Jesus’ departure from the temple on the last day of the festival (7:37-8:59). It probably begins not far from the temple. This section opens with the healing of a blind man (9:1-7) and closes with the recognition that this miracle was not what was expected from a demon (10:21). [10]
If John 9:1-10:21 follows “directly on Jesus’ departure from the temple” and “probably begins not far from the temple,” the temporal continuation on that day seems very likely.
Raymond Brown:
After the long and intricate discourses of vii-viii, ch. Ix provides a pleasant interlude. How closely is ch. Ix related to the Tabernacles setting of vii-viii? In itself the story is complete and could have a place anywhere in one of Jesus’ visits to Jerusalem; for instance, there are many similarities with chapter iii (see Notes on ix 24, 39,33, 39). However, the intensity of the hatred of the Pharisees for Jesus makes the general setting of the Tabernacles pilgrimage quite appropriate. The pool of Siloam (vs. 7) played a role in the water ceremonies we discussed in relation to vii 37-38; and ix 4- 5 develop the theme of light in darkness which is also a Tabernacle theme, as we saw in discussing viii 12.
Nevertheless, the immediate connection of ch. xi with the feast and with what was said in viii is not assured. John give no precise dating for the healing, and the next indication of time will be that of the feast of Dedication, three months after Tabernacles, in x 22. Thus, even if we would accept the present Gospel order and agree that the healing is related to the Tabernacles visit, there may be a considerable gap in time alluded to between viii and ix. [11]
Brown notes the strong thematic connection between the healing of the blind man and Yeshua’s immediate ministry in the temple, but concludes the correlation may or may not bode for a temporal connection.
D. A. Carson:
As he went along is sufficiently vague as a connector that very little precise information about time and place can be deduced. Because of the (thematic) connections ch. 9 has with chs. 8 and 10 (cf. notes, above), we must suppose Jesus is still in Jerusalem, presumably at some point between the Feast of Tabernacles and the Feast of Dedication. [12]
Carson’s translation As he went along ignores the conjunctive Καὶ and indeed sounds rather vague. However, John uses the same Greek verb in both John 8:59 and 9:1: The New King James Version reads 8:59 … and so passed by (παρῆγεν). 9:1 Now as Jesus passed by… (παράγων). Adopting Carson’s translation in both verses 8:59 “…and so went along (παρῆγεν).” 9:1 “(And) As he went along (παράγων)…” Carson’s translation may seem vague, but the Apostle John’s repetition hardly seems vague.
Leon Morris:
There is no time note. John does not relate this incident to others in his story, and we are left to guess at its plain in the sequence. Hoskyns says that the incident took place on the last day of the Feast of Tabernacles, but this is pure assumption. It is most likely that some time has elapsed since the attempt on Jesus’ life (8:59), but more than this we cannot say. [13]
Ignoring the similarities between verse 8:59 and 9:1, does not disprove the potential temporal connection between the two pericopes in the overall narrative… especially in light of shared thematic content.
Andreas Köstenberger:
It is unclear exactly how much time has elapsed since Jesus’ clash with the Jewish authorities at the end of the Feast of the Tabernacles (chs. 7-8). But since the Feast was observed in September or October (in A.D. 32, Tabernacles fell on September 10-17); since both chapters 9 and 10 take place in Jerusalem (note the mention of the pool of Siloam in 9:7 and Solomon’s colonnade in 10:23); since there is no clear demarcation between chapters 9 and 10; and since 10:22 refers to the Feast of Dedication, which took place in Jerusalem in mid-December, it can be inferred that the healing of the man born blind must have taken place between October and mid- December (A.D. 32). [14]
Inferring a date between October and mid-December, may leave open the possible temporal connection between John 8:59 and John 9:1.
Herman Ridderbos:
Ch. 9 displays a clear, well-constructed, inner unity. The connection with what preceded is very loose (if one can even speak of it; see the comments on vs. 1). [15]
Very well, the comments read:
1,2 For context, see above; “pass by can also simply mean “move on” (cf. Mt. 9:9, where Jesus also “saw a man”). “Seeing” does not simply refer to observation but serves to introduce what follows (vs. 3b); it is a seeing that evoked a certain reaction in Jesus. [16]
J. Ramsey Michaels:
The opening words, “And as he was passing by,” are fully consistent with the notion that the temple discourse of the two previous chapter is over, and that a new sequence of events (at an undetermined time, but still in Jerusalem) is under way. [17]
Michaels does not correlate the repetition of words or phrases to draw a connection between John 8:59 and John 9:1.
Rodney A. Whitacre:
Perhaps some time has elapsed since his confrontation with the authorities in the temple, though as the story reads he could be coming straight from their debate . Certainly John intends us to connect this healing with the previous chapter, as the references to Jesus as the light of the world indicate (8:12; 9:5). [18]
Whitacre acknowledges a possible temporal connection; does “as the story reads” indicate the possibility that he recognizes a strategic repetition of words in both verses?
John 2:24-25 and John 3:1-2
Thankfully, the Apostle John uses repetition and similarity of key words to connect pericopes into larger narratives elsewhere in his gospel. Consider John 2:24-25 and John 3:1-2.
2:24 But Jesus did not commit Himself to them, because He knew all men,
2:25 and had no need that anyone should testify of man , (ἀνθρώπου) for He knew what was in man (ἀνθρώπῳ).
3:1 There was a man (ἄνθρωπος) of the Pharisees named Nicodemus, a ruler of the Jews.
3:2 This man came to Jesus by night and said to Him, “Rabbi, we know that You are a teacher come from God; for no one can do these signs that You do unless God is with him.” (John 2:24-25 and John 3:1; underlining added)
Keener:
That John calls Nicodemus ἄνθρωπος, a “man” or “person” of the Pharisees (3:1), may be inconsequential (the term appears more than fifty times in the Gospel), but “a Pharisee” would have been simpler; this term appears nowhere else in the Gospel, linked with Pharisees in the genitive. John probably employs the term here to make explicit the connection with “people” ( ἀνθρώπου… ἀνθρώπῳ) whose hearts Jesus knew in 2:25. [19]
Indeed, “Pharisee” is simpler than man of the Pharisees, yet John would have missed the opportunity to draw a stylistic connection between the two pericopes.
Brown:
Now. This seems to tie the beginning of ch iii to ii 23-25. a Pharisee . Literally “a man of the Pharisees”; perhaps this use of “man” is designed to recall the end of the last verse (ii 25) where we heard that Jesus was aware of what was in man’s heart . Notice here how Jesus knows what is in Nicodemus’ heart. [20]
Brown’s translation of δὲ as “Now” helps him correlate John 2:24-25 with John 3:1-2; Nicodemus is an example of men whose hearts Yeshua knew.
John obviously intends Nicodemus to illustrate a partial faith in Jesus on the basis of signs and has prepared the way for this with ii 23-25. Such an illustration comes logically after examples of more satisfactory faith (the disciples at Cana) and of complete lack of faith (“the Jews” at the Temple). Thus, the sequence is at least logical. [21]
According to Brown, John does not follow a chronological sequence, but the use of the word translated man may signal a logical sequence from the author; Nicodemus is an illustration of the partial faith summarized in John 2:23-25..
Carson:
The word that connects this narrative with the preceding chapter is δὲ, commonly rendered ‘and’ (NIV’s Now is an idiomatic adaption) or ‘but’. If some variation of ‘and’ is accepted, the idea is that Nicodemus exemplified those who in some sense believed in Jesus, but with a faith so inadequate that Jesus did not entrust himself to them (2:23-25)… On the other hand, if δὲ has its more usual adversative force (‘but’), it means that, in contrast to those with inadequate faith at the end of ch. 2, Nicodemus’ approach was not so faulty and Jesus did entrust himself to him. [22]
Though Carson ignores the repetition of the Greek word translated man , he highlights that how the conjunction δὲ is interpreted changes the meaning of the passage significantly. Ironically, if in John 8:59 and 9:1 the conjunction καὶ is repeated, respectively (καὶ παρῆγεν οὕτως) and (Καὶ παράγων), does this highlight a potential connection between them? Carson’s translation renders John 9:1: “As he went along.” However, you and I might literally translate John 8:59, “and He passed by in this manner” and in the very next verse, John 9:1, “And passing by.”
Morris:
The expression “a man of the Pharisees” is as unusual an expression in Greek as in English. The use of ἄνθρωπος is probably meant to link the opening words of this chapter with the closing words of the preceding one, and so bring out Jesus’ knowledge of “man.” This will also be behind the use of a αὐτὸν rather than Ιησοῦς in the first reference to the Lord. [23]
The repeated use of the Greek word translated man is unusual and probably links “the opening words of John Chapter 3 with the conclusion to John chapter 2… “of course, we have no means of knowing how long after the events of ch. 2 Nicodemus came to Jesus.” [24]
Köstenberger:
John 2:23-25 summarizes the response to Jesus’ ministry in Jerusalem by the general populace (in contrast to the hostility of the Jewish leadership [2:18, 20]; note in the Greek text the repeated use of the imperfect tense, indicating continuing action), sandwiched between Jesus’ clearing of the temple and his encounter with Nicodemus. Perhaps more than concluding 2:13-22, these verses commence the Nicodemus narrative. This may be suggested by the overlapping terminology ( ἄνθρωπος [Anthropos, man or human being] in 2:25 and 3:1; σημεῖα [semeia, signs] in 2:23 and 3:2; the use of ἦν δὲ [en de, now he/there was]in 2:23 and 3:1 .
If so, then the comments regarding Jesus’ realistic attitude toward humans and his knowledge of the sinful human heart are designed to introduce the account of Nicodemus’ coming to Jesus. [25]
Köstenberger sees the repetition of the Greek words, ἄνθρωπος (man), σημεῖα (signs), and ἦν δὲ (now he and there was) linking both passages such that John 2:23-25 introduces the Nicodemus narrative.
Ridderbos:
The conversation with Nicodemus offers a very specific elaboration of what was said in a more general sense in 2:23-25. In the figure of Nicodemus we are given an illustrative demonstration—perhaps we may say par excellence—of what is in the preceding is called “the faith” of the many in Jerusalem who were impressed by the signs that Jesus did.
Nicodemus is introduced as “a man of the Pharisees.” “A man” could simply mean “someone,” but in light of the repeated ἄνθρωπος in 2:25 (and with a view to 3:4, 27), the use of the word is probably intentional. [26]
Ridderbos finds the connection between John 8:59 and John 9:1 “very loose,” the connection between John 2:23-25 and John 3:1-2 very tight with the repeated use of the Greek word for man “probably intention.”
Michaels:
Someone once said, “If you want people to read what you’ve written, don’t write about the Man, write about a man.” The repetition of the noun “person” or “man” (anthropos)links the story of Nicodemus closely to what precedes. [27]
Michaels is convinced the repetition of the Greek word for man links John 2:23-25 and John 3:1-2.
Whitacre:
Nicodemus is one of these who have an untrustworthy faith. John signals this connection by his repetition of the word man (2:25; 3:1) and by the fact that Nicodemus’s assessment of Jesus is based on the signs he had seen (3:2; sf. 2:23). [28]
Summary
Whether, in either one or the other of these transition passages (John 2:23-25—John 3:1-2 or John 8:59—John 9:1) or both, all of these commentators (perhaps with the exception of D.A. Carson) recognize to some degree John’s use of repetition and similarity in language to signify unity and continuity in the transition between different accounts. Correlation is recognized more often (and with greater vigor) between John 2:23-25 and John 3:1-2 in support of a popular, yet mistaken, theological interpretation of faith based upon signs. The correlation between John 8:59 and John 9:1 is less frequent (and less vigorous). Instead, chapter 9, the healing of the man born blind, is viewed by some scholars as “a pleasant interlude” [29] coming on the heels of two intense discourses in the temple.
Conclusion
The word choices made by the Apostle John in John 8:59 and John 9:1 are wonderfully similar and purposefully chosen.
8:59 Then they took up stones to throw at Him; but Jesus hid Himself and went out of the temple, going through the midst of them, and so passed by (καὶ παρῆγεν οὕτως).
9:1 Now as Jesus passed by (Καὶ παράγων), He saw a man who was blind from birth. (John 8:59 and John 9:1; underlining added)
Should you and I translate literally, verse 8:59 might read, “and so passed by” while verse 9:1 might read “And passing by.” This contiguous similarity of phrases, καὶ παρῆγεν… καὶ παράγων, along with their simple straightforward meaning, when combined with the thematic similarities between the account John 8:59 concludes and the account 9:1 introduces, convinces this author that the Apostle John uses a literary devise to purposefully connect the two passages, both thematically and chronologically, into one long and grueling day of ministry.
Copyright © Frank Tyler 2023
[1] Many commentators fail to see the continuity between John 8:59 and John 9:1. Please see Appendix A for a discussion. Unless otherwise noted, all Scripture is quoted from the New King James Version of the Holy Bible (Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson, 1982).
[2] Arnold G. Fruchtenbaum, “The Three Messianic Miracles,” Christology: The Doctrine of Messiah Study 17 [http://www.messianicassociation.org/ezine48-af-three-messianic-miracles.htm, 18-19.].
[3] According to Dr. Fruchtenbaum, “the ancient rabbis separated miracles into two categories. First were those miracles anyone would be able to perform if they were empowered by the Spirit of God to do so. The second category of miracles were called ‘messianic miracles,’ which were miracles only the Messiah would be able to perform” [Arnold G. Fruchtenbaum, “The Three Messianic Miracles,” 3].
[4] Arnold G. Fruchtenbaum, “The Three Messianic Miracles,” 23.
[5] Arnold G. Fruchtenbaum, “The Three Messianic Miracles,” 22.
[6] Ibid., “The Three Messianic Miracles,” 22.
[7] The Festival of Tabernacles ends on the 22ndof Tishri while the Festival of Dedication begins on the 25 th of Chislev. There are 30 days in Tishri leaving 8 days from the end of Tabernacles to the end of Tishri. The 29 days of Marchesran precede Chislev leaving 8 days in Tishri+29 days in Marchesran+25 days in Chislev or 62 days between the end of Tabernacles to the beginning of Dedication . Holman Bible Dictionary ed. Trent C. Butler (Nashville, TN: Holman Bible Publishers, 1991), 486-87.
[8] And this is eternal life, that they may know You, the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom You have sent (John 17:3; underlining added).
[9] Nicodemus wisely brought his disciples to Yeshua at night away from the pressure and intimidation of the Judean authorities in order for them to carefully weigh for themselves Yeshua’s words and ministry (John 3:1-21). Persuasion often requires quiet waters; some of the many in John 10:42 were likely Pharisees and rulers seeking Him away from the rancor and prejudice of power. If so, then as their words reflect, John the Baptist’s witness (John 1:29-34) remained instrumental in their coming to believe in Yeshua.
[10] Craig S. Keener, The Gospel of John: A Commentary Vol. One (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson Publishers, 2003), 775; underlining added.
[11] Raymond E. Brown, The Gospel According to John (I—XII), Anchor Bible Series, Vol 29 (New York: Doubleday, 1966), 376; underlining added.
[12] D. A. Carson, The Gospel According to John, The Pillar New Testament Commentary (Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans Publishing, 1991), 361.
[13] Leon Morris, The Gospel According to John Revised, The New International Commentary on the New Testament, ed. Gordon Fee (Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1995), 424.
[14] Andreas J. Kostenberger, John, Baker Exegetical Commentary on the New Testament, ed. Robert Yarbrough and Robert H. Stein (Grand Rapids, MI: Baker Academic, 2004), 278
[15] Herman Ridderbos, The Gospel of John: A Theological Commentary, translated John Vriend (Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 1997), 331.
[16] Herman Ridderbos, The Gospel of John: A Theological Commentary, 332.
[17] J. Ramsey Michaels, The Gospel of John, The New International Commentary on the New Testament ed. Joel B. Green (Grand Rapids, MI: William B. Eerdmans Publishing Company, 2010), 539.
[18] Rodney A. Whitacre, John, The IVP New Testament Commentary Series, ed. Grant Osborne (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 1999), 235; underlining added.
[19] Keener, The Gospel of John , Vol. One, 535; underlining added.
[20] Brown, The Gospel According to John (I—XII), 129; underlining added.
[21] Ibid., 135.
[22] Carson,The Gospel According to John, 185.
[23] Morris, The Gospel According to John Revised , 186; underlining added.
[24] Ibid., 186.
[25] Kostenberger, John, 117; underlining added.
[26] Ridderbos, The Gospel of John: A Theological Commentary, 123; underlining added.
[27] Michaels, The Gospel of John , 176; underlining added.
[28] Whitacre, John , 87; underlining added.
[29] Brown, The Gospel According to John (I—XII) , 376.
By Bob Wilkin
Introduction
The doctrine of salvation, also known as soteriology—from the Greek word for salvation, sōtēria—typically is divided into five to ten major categories, including the Person of Christ, the work of Christ, eternal security, the terms of salvation, election, sanctification, and perseverance.
All treatments of soteriology begin with a discussion of the role of Christ in salvation.
Lewis Sperry Chafer, the founder and first president of DTS, has five sections in his volume on soteriology, and the first section is entitled, “The Savior.” [1] That section takes up 154 of the 396 pages, or nearly 40%.
Bible.org suggests three sections: the nature of the atonement, the extent of the atonement, and the process of salvation (election, regeneration, conversion, union with Christ, justification, adoption, sanctification, perseverance, glorification). [2] The first two of those sections concern the role of Christ in salvation.
In Thiessen’s systematic theology, his first two sections (of ten) on soteriology, after an introductory discussion, are on the Person of Christ and the work of Christ. [3]
The Bible certainly centers on Christ, the Messiah, especially in its discussion of soteriology. For example, in John’s Gospel, the only evangelistic book in the Bible (see John 20:30-31), the Lord Jesus repeatedly said that whoever believes in Himwill not perish but has everlasting life (e.g., John 3:16; 5:24; 6:35, 37; 11:26). Jesus Himself is the One who guarantees everlasting life to all who believe in Him for it.
In Galatians, in Paul’s defense of his gospel, he begins by talking about the grace of Christ and the gospel of Christ (Gal 1:6-9). Three times in Gal 2:16 Paul says that justification is by faith in Jesus Christ and not by the works of the law.
In Rom 3:21–4:25, Paul’s exposition on justification by faith alone, he repeatedly says that it is through faith in Jesus Christ that one is justified before God.
As we consider this vital topic, let us begin with a brief word about the words saveand salvation.
A Brief Word on Save and Salvation
The Biblical doctrine of salvation concerns every way in which the Bible says that God saves people. This includes salvation from eternal condemnation, healing from illness, saving from deadly storms, delivering someone from his enemies, and delivering people from the deadly consequences of walking in the darkness. The doctrine of salvation is not exclusively the doctrine whereby God gives people everlasting life.
In the OT, 100% of the references to salvation and deliverance refer to deliverance of individuals and nations in this life.[4]In the NT, 70% of the references to salvation and deliverance refer to deliverance in this life. [5] Only in the NT do we find the words saveand salvationused in reference to regeneration, and then only rarely. [6]
However, for the purpose of this article, we will discuss specifically one type of salvation, salvation from eternal condemnation. What is Christ’s role in people’s being saved from eternal condemnation?
The Person of Christ Is Essential to Salvation
Some like to speak of the three aspects of Christ that are central to our salvation: His Person, His provision, and His promise. [7]
We will begin by considering the importance of the Person of Christ in our salvation.
There could be no salvation for sinful humans unless God provided a perfect Savior. Nothing less than perfection would do.
The OT sacrificial system required unblemished sacrifices.The OT sacrifices pointed to the coming Messiah: “And every priest stands ministering daily and offering repeatedly the same sacrifices, which can never take away sins. But this Man, after He had offered one sacrifice for sins forever, sat down at the right hand of God…” (Heb 10:11-12).
The OT priests stood. They offered sacrifices repeatedly. Christ offered one sacrifice for sins. Never to be repeated. Then He sat down.
The reason why Jesus’ one sacrifice was sufficient was because of His Person. He was the sinless sacrifice that all the OT sacrifices pointed to (“a shadow of the good things to come,” Heb 10:1).
Paul said, “For He made Him who knew no sin to be sin for us, that we might become the righteousness of God in Him” (2 Cor 5:21).
There could be no perfect Savior unless God Himself became a man, which He did.
The Lord Jesus is God (John 1:1). He has all the attributes of God: He is eternal, holy, righteous, good, just, loving, omnipotent, omniscient, and impeccable.
Impeccability means that Jesus was incapable of sinning both in His deity and in His perfect humanity and in His united Person. He not only did not sin. He could not sin. Many insist that He had to be able to sin in order for Him to be tempted (Heb 4:15). Charles Hodge is representative of the view of many,
If He was a true man, He must have been capable of sinning. That He did not sin under the greatest provocations; that when He was reviled, He blessed; when He suffered He threatened not; that He was dumb as a sheep before its shearers, is held up to us as an example. Temptation implies the possibility of sin. If from the constitution of his person it was impossible for Christ to sin, then his temptation was unreal and without effect and He cannot sympathize with his people. [8]
Hodges takes the opposite position, that Jesus could not sin:
Though unlike them He was without sin (cf. 7:26; 2 Cor. 5:21; 1 John 3:5), never responding wrongly to any of His temptations (nor could He, being God), yet as a man He could feel their reality (much as an immovable boulder can bear the brunt of a raging sea) and thus He is able to sympathize (sympathēsai, lit., “to feel or suffer with”) with their and our weaknesses. It may indeed be argued, and has been, that only One who fully resists temptation can know the extent of its force. Thus, the sinless One has a greater capacity for compassion than any sinner could have for a fellow sinner. [9]
Likewise, R. Carlton Wynne wrote at the Desiring God website: “Taking humanity to himself meant assuming a true human nature — with its creaturely mind, affections, body, and will — but one that, in perfect harmony with his deity, could seek nothing but wholehearted delight in the Father’s purposes (cf. John 6:38).” [10]
The following titles of Christ found in the NT show the importance of His Person in our salvation: the way, the truth, the life, the faithful High Priest, the Seed of the woman, the Son of God, the Son of Man, the Holy One, the One who knew no sin, the Alpha and the Omega, and the Savior of the world.
People do not need to understand everything about the Person of Christ in order to have everlasting life. [11] What they need to understand is that He is fully capable of giving everlasting life to all who believe in Him for it.
The Work of Christ Is Essential to Salvation
Concerning that middle element, the provision of Christ, I prefer to refer to the work of Christ because His work was broader than His death on the cross for our sins.
His work includes His incarnation (John 3:16), His sinless life (2 Cor 5:21), the miracles He did (John 20:30), the teaching He gave (the Gospel of John), the suffering He underwent (Isaiah 53; 1 Pet 3:18), His death on the cross for our sins (John 3:14-15), His burial in a rich man’s tomb (Isa 53:9; Matt 27:57-60), His three days in Hades (Matt 12:40; Luke 23:43), His bodily resurrection on the third day (1 Cor 15:18-19), His post-resurrection appearances (1 Cor 15:5-8), and His ascension into heaven (Acts 1:9-11). All of that was essential for our salvation.
Jesus’ last words on the cross before He committed His spirit to the Father were “It is finished” (John 19:30). All throughout His ministry, He had spoken about the importance of His finishing the work the Father gave Him to do (John 4:34; 5:36; 17:4; 19:30). His whole life and ministry were pointed toward Calvary. But all that led up to the cross were also essential works of Christ for our salvation.
Commenting on Heb 10:11-12, Bruce writes:
The Aaronic priests never sat down in the sanctuary; they remained standing throughout the whole performance of their sacred duties. In this our author sees a token of the fact that their sacred duties were never done, that their sacrifices had always to be repeated. In v. 1 the repetition of the ritual of the Day of Atonement “year by year” was mentioned; here, as in 7:27, the reference is to those sacrifices which were offered “day by day.” But whether the repetition was annual or daily, the main point is that repetition was necessary; not one of these sacrifices could remove sin or cleanse the conscience with permanent effect. The completion of one sacrifice meant only that a similar one would have to be offered in due course, and so on indefinitely; it was in keeping with this that the priests of the old order never sat down in the presence of God when a sacrifice had been presented to him.
But it was equally in keeping with the perfection of Christ’s sacrifice of himself that, when he had presented it to God, he sat down. No further sacrificial service can be required of the priest who appeared on earth in the fulness of time to put away sin and sanctify his people once for all. A seated priest is the guarantee of a finished work and an accepted sacrifice. The heavenly high priest has indeed a continual ministry to discharge on his people’s behalf at the Father’s right hand; but that is the ministry of intercession on the basis of the sacrifice presented and accepted once for all; it is not the constant or repeated offering of his sacrifice. [12]
Many point to Rom 5:10 to suggest that we are not saved by the death of Christ, but by His life. There Paul says, “For if when we were enemies we were reconciled to God through the death of His Son, much more, having been reconciled, we shall be saved by His life.” But Paul is speaking about sanctification, about being saved from God’s wrath in this life (cf. Rom 1:18-32). [13]
In Eph 2:8-9, Paul uses a perfect tense to express the idea that regeneration is a past event with an abiding result: “by grace you have been saved through faith…” By contrast, in Rom 5:10, Paul uses a future tense: we shall be saved by His life. Hodges has shown that all the uses of sōzō and sōtēria in Romans refer to deliverance from the wrath of God in this life. Never in Romans do those words refer to regeneration.
While Rom 5:10 does not prove the point, it is true that no one could be saved by faith in Christ if Christ had sinned. His had to be an unblemished sacrifice (2 Cor 5:21: Heb 10:1-14). That is, He not only had to have died on the cross for our sins and risen from the dead, but He also had to have lived a sinless life.
It would be accurate to say that we are saved both by the life of Christ and by the death of Christ. His death on the cross was only effective because of His sinless life.
The Promise of Christ Is Essential to Salvation
Not only did Jesus need to be the right Person and do the right works, but He also had to make the right promise. Without the promise of everlasting life, no one could be saved.
He stated the promise in verses such as John 3:16; 5:24; 6:47; 11:26; Rev 22:17.
In the NT this promise is called “the promise of life” (2 Tim 1:1; see also Gal 3:21; Titus 1:2) or “the word of life” (Acts 5:20; Phil 2:16; see also 1 John 1:1).
The promise is found in the OT as well, starting in Gen 3:15 and continuing in Gen 15:6. The Lord Jesus said the OT proclaimed that those who believe in Him have everlasting life (John 5:39-40). Hebrews 11 gives many examples of OT people who believed in Jesus for their eternal destiny. For example, Abraham “waited for the city which has foundations, whose builder and maker is God” (Heb 11:10). He knew he would one day be raised and would see the New Jerusalem. The Lord Jesus said, “Abraham rejoiced to see My day” (John 8:56).
Moses “esteem[ed] the reproach of Christ greater riches than the treasure in Egypt, for he looked to the reward” (Heb 11:26). Only one who knew he would be in the coming kingdom could look forward to eternal rewards.
Some have suggested that one need not believe the promise of Christ in order to be born again. They suggest that faith in Christ’s Person and work is sufficient.
Morrison, for example, writes, “John 9:35-41 provides strong evidence that to believe in Christ is not to merely accept the proposition that Jesus gives eternal life but rather has as its object the Man Himself.” [14] His statement may seem to imply that one must believe in the promise of everlasting life as well as the Person of Christ (“not to merely accept the proposition that Jesus gives eternal life…”). However, he goes on to say, “One may infer, of course, from the rest of John’s Gospel (e.g., John 6:47) that this man therefore had eternal life, but the fact remains that it is not clear that this man is at any point asked to believe a promise. Instead, he is asked to believe in a person.” [15]
Similarly, commenting on Paul’s sermon in Antioch, as recorded in Acts 13, Stegall says,
This passage does not tell us that “everlasting life”was necessarily even part of “the things spoken by Paul”(v. 45) that constituted “the Word of God”(v. 44) in his evangelistic message “on the next Sabbath”(v. 44). Though the Galatians clearly heard about “everlasting life,”it was only at the conclusionof Paul’s evangelism on the second Sabbath and only afterthey had already rejected the gospel (“the Word of God”) in verse 44. [16]
Others, however, recognize that belief in Christ’s promise is essential in order to be born again. In his book, The Future of Justification: A Response to N. T. Wright , John Piper has a section which asks the question, “We Are Not Justified by Belief in Justification?” [17] He quotes Wright as saying, “We are not justified by faith by believing in justification by faith. We are justified by faith by believing the gospel itself—in other words, that Jesus is Lord and that God raised him from the dead.” [18] Piper continues,
This sounds right. Of course, we are not saved by doctrine. We are saved by Christ. But it is misleading because it leaves the meaning of “believing in the gospel” undefined. Believing in the gospel for what? Prosperity? Healing? A new job?…we will have to announce why this death and resurrection are good news for them (italics his).
Similarly, Hodges writes,
I now realize that no one is saved by praying a prayer. They are saved when they understand God’s offer of eternal life through Jesus and believe it. That’s when people are saved. And that’s the only time when people are saved. All of the excess baggage that we bring into our encounter with unsaved sinners is just that, excess baggage! [19]
Five Major Views on the Atonement
There are many views concerning why Jesus died on the cross for our sins. I will briefly outline five major ones.
Moral influence theory.Jesus’ death on the cross and His entire life are an example for us on how to live so that we might gain everlasting life. This is a form of works salvation.
Franklin Johnson summarizes the view in this way,
While the Christian world as a whole believes in a substitutionary atonement, the doctrine is rejected by a minority of devout and able men, who present instead of it what has often been called the "moral-influence theory." According to this, the sole mission of Christ was to reveal the love of God in a way so moving as to melt the heart and induce men to forsake sin. [20]
Ransom to Satan.In this view, God had to pay Satan with the death of His Son in order to set people free from bondage to Satan and sin. This is another form of works salvation since the aim is moral reformation for salvation.
Ligonier ministries describes this view as follows: “One other view that has circulated in church history is that Christ’s death was a ransom paid to Satan. When Christ died, He paid a price to Satan in order to secure our release from bondage to Satan’s kingdom.” [21] They go on to critique the view in this way: “The Bible does view the Atonement as a ransom paid (see Mark 10:45). But it is a ransom paid to God the Father. There is no negotiation between the Devil and the Lord for the release of the captives. Rather, we are redeemed by having Christ crush the head of the serpent after He pays the ransom to God.” [22]
Christus Victor.This means Christ, the Victor.In this view, Satan was not paid anything. However, similar to the previous view, Christ’s death defeated evil and set people free to live righteously. This too is another form of works salvation.
I should mention that while the three views above are way off regarding justification, they are on the right track concerning sanctification. The death of Christ does make freedom from slavery to sin a positional reality for all who believe in Jesus. It makes freedom from sin’s bondage a reality in the experience of every believer who is walking in the light and in fellowship with God.
But we are not born again by living a righteous life.
Anselm’s Satisfaction Theory.According to this view, the sinfulness of man is an injustice that must be dealt with in order to satisfy God’s justice. The death of Christ serves to satisfy God’s justice.
There are aspects of works salvation here as well, since one is not born again by believing in Jesus and thereby having God’s justice satisfied. The death of Christ makes it possible for people to live in such a way as to satisfy God’s justice. In a sense, this view sees Christ’s death as making us savable. But the condition for salvation and the nature of it were wrong.
Anselm believed that salvation began with baptism, and it was maintained by regularly partaking of the eucharist, as well as confessing one’s sins and doing acts of penance.
Penal Substitutionary Atonement.The Reformers, Calvin and Luther, developed a new theory, one that was related to Anselm’s view and was a modification of it. In this view, Jesus died in our place. The result is that humans are savable. But unlike Anselm’s view on how people were saved, this view teaches that people are saved by faith alone (though how they define faith varies greatly). Some who hold to substitutionary atonement believe that salvation cannot be lost.
The idea of substitution is found in the words fororin place of,huperand periin Greek(“Christ died forour sins,” 1 Cor 15:3; 1 John 3:16;) and ransom (“He gave His life a ransom for many,” Mark 10:45).
This last view is the view of most Evangelicals.
Unlimited vs. Limited Atonement (“L” in TULIP)
An important issue in the death of Christ is whether He died for everyone (the doctrine known as unlimited atonement) or whether He died only for a select group of people (the doctrine which is called limited atonement).
Calvinists believe that Christ died only for “the elect.” Most of humanity was not chosen to have everlasting life; Christ did not die for most people.
There is a modified Calvinist view—that Christ died only for those who would one day believe that on the cross, He died in their place. In this view, one must believe not only that Christ died on the cross for our sins, but that He did so as our substitute. One who believes other views of the atonement would not be eligible for salvation. This too is limited atonement, though I have heard people swear that it is unlimited since Christ potentially died for all, even if His death actually counts only for those who believe in substitutionary atonement.
But that is exactly what limited atonement teaches: Christ potentially died for all, but He actually died only for the elect, and the elect are the only people who will be given what Calvinists call the gift of faith .
Many people wrongly think that if Christ died for all, then all would be given everlasting life. They wrongly think that the purpose of the shed blood of Christ was to save everyone for whom He died. God actually had many purposes for the shed blood of Christ. [23] But none of those purposes were to save those for whom Christ died. God purposed that [PE1] Christ’s blood makes everyone savable(John 1:29; 1 John 2:2). But whether anyone will be saved depends on whether he believes in Jesus for everlasting life.
The Scriptures clearly teach unlimited atonement. See John 3:16; 2 Pet 2:1; 1 John 2:2.
Jesus Is God’s Greatest Evangelist
Alex MacDonald says, “Our Lord Jesus gave us the greatest example of preaching, but he also gave us the greatest example of evangelism.” [24] Adrian Warnock agrees: “Jesus is the model evangelist, and we can learn from his example how to get caught up on his mission to seek and save the lost.” [25] Both of those men use Jesus’ interaction with the woman at the well in John 4 to prove their point. Zane Hodges’s first book, The Hungry Inherit,was devoted to that interaction as well.
Though not specifically using the expression God’s greatest evangelist, Hodges says that the message we should be proclaiming today is the message the Lord Jesus Christ gave to the woman at the well:
He wanted them [His disciples] to say “Come!” to everyone He sent them to and to broadcast far and wide the availability of His living water. That was the message of God’s Holy Spirit. That would be the message of the whole Christian church, Christ’s bride (Eph 5:25-32). [26]
Most evangelistic tracts and presentations are based upon a collage of verses drawn mainly from the NT epistles. Rarely do evangelistic presentations concentrate on the evangelistic ministry of the Lord Jesus Christ. His evangelistic ministry has not received the attention that it deserves.
Jesus said, “I am the light of the world.” He is the one who reveals God and God’s truth to us. Of special importance was His revealing God’s truth about everlasting life (John 6:68).
Zane Hodges wrote a booklet entitled, Jesus: God’s Prophet. [27] He showed that all NT doctrine found in the epistles flows directly from the teachings of the Lord Jesus. That was true of the doctrine of salvation as well.
John 3:16 is still in effect today. So are the scores of verses in John’s Gospel where the Lord Jesus said that whoever believes in Him has everlasting life, will never perish, will never hunger or thirst, will never die spiritually, will never be cast out, and so forth.
Whatever the epistles teach, they do not contradict the words of the Lord Jesus Christ.
Paul tells us in Galatians that he received his gospel directly from the Lord Jesus. His was not some new message. His was the same message that Jesus preached.
Jesus is much more than the Savior. He is our Lord. He is our King. He is our soon-returning Judge. He is also our Teacher . He is the Light of the world. He is everlasting life.
Conclusion
The Lord Jesus Christ is central to anyone’s gaining everlasting life. There could be no salvation apart from His incarnation, sinless life, substitutionary death, and bodily resurrection. And there could be no regeneration apart from His promise of everlasting life to all who simply believe in Him for it. For any human being to be saved requires the Person of Christ, the work of Christ, and the promise of Christ.
He is the object of saving faith. We are not saved by our works or by our faith plus our works. We are saved by believing in Jesus, the Giver, for the gift of God, that is, everlasting life (John 4:10, 14).
Copyright © Bob Wilkin 2022, reprinted 2023
[1] Lewis Sperry Chafer, Systematic Theology, Vol. 3: Soteriology (Dallas, TX: Dallas Seminary Press, 1948), pp. 11-164.
[2] Greg Herrick, “Soteriology: Salvation” at https://bible.org/seriespage/7-soteriology-salvation.
[3] Henry Clarence Thiessen, Introductory Lectures in Systematic Theology(Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1949), pp. 283-340.
[4] Robert N. Wilkin, The Ten Most Misunderstood Words in the Bible(N.p.: Grace Evangelical Society, 2012), 36-40.
[5] Ibid., 40-47.
[6] See, for example, John 3:17; 5:34; 10:9; Acts 11:14; 13:26; 16:31; Eph 2:5, 8; 1 Tim 2:4; Titus 3:5.
[7] Charlie Bing, “The Content of the Gospel of Salvation,” GraceNotes no. 40, available at https://www.gracelife.org/resources/gracenotes/?id=40&lang=eng . Last accessed June 29, 2022.
[8] Cf. Charles Hodge, Systematic Theology, Vol. 2 (New York, NY: Scribner, Armstrong, and Co., 1873), 457. The book can be read online at https://www.google.com/books/edition/Systematic_Theology/V7wim5btRzMC?hl=en&gbpv=1.
[9] Zane C. Hodges, “Hebrews” in The Bible Knowledge Commentary,Vol. 2,edited by John F. Walvoord and Roy B. Zuck (Grand Rapids, MI: Victor Books, 1985), p. 790, emphasis added.
[10] “Could Jesus Have Sinned?” available at https://www.desiringgod.org/articles/could-jesus-have-sinned . Last accessed August 24, 2022. Emphasis added. See also D. Blair Smith, “Was It Possible for Jesus to Sin?” at https://www.thegospelcoalition.org/article/possible-jesus-sin// . Last accessed August 24, 2022.
[11] Some suggest that one must believe in the deity of Christ to be born again. See, for example, Thomas L. Stegall, The Gospel of the Christ(Milwaukee, WI: Grace Gospel Press, 2009), 353-61, 540; J. B. Hixson, Getting the Gospel Wrong(N.p.: Xulon Press, 2008), 85-90. Precisely what must be believed about the deity of Christ to have everlasting life is not explained. It is hard to sustain this view in light of the fact that the apostles were born again before they believed in the deity of Christ. Belief in His deity should lead a person to believe in Him for the promise of everlasting life. Sadly, however, there are untold millions today who believe in the deity of Christ and yet who do not believe that everlasting life is a free gift received by faith alone, apart from works.
[12] F. F. Bruce, The Epistle to the Hebrews, rev. ed., (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1990), 245.
[13] See “Salvation by the Life of Christ” at https://activechristianity.org/what-does-it-mean-to-be-saved-by-the-life-of-christ-romans-510 . Last accessed August 5, 2022. While not crystal clear, the author sees a second type of salvation in Rom 5:10: “In the first salvation we receive forgiveness for committed sins. The second salvation comes by walking in obedience to the faith, because it is written: Walk in the light while you have the light, that you may become sons of light. In the light is life, and in the light was life, and life is the light of man. Being a child of the light is the same as being a child of life.”
[14] Chris Morrison, “Hodges’ “Promise Only’ Gospel in Light of John 9:35-41),” 1. It is available at chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://cmmorrison.files.wordpress.com/2014/12/john-9-paper.pdf. Last accessed August 16, 2022.
[15] Ibid., 14. In my commentary on John, I point to this very fact to suggest that the man born blind was already an OT believer before he discovered that Jesus is the Messiah he had already believed in for his eternal destiny: “However, unlike John 4 or the other evangelistic encounters in John’s Gospel, here Jesus never mentions everlasting life. To say the least, that is odd and should cause us to wonder why. Since we have no other evangelistic encounters in John where everlasting life is not mentioned by Jesus, it seems probable that this man is an OT believer, that is, one who previously had believed in the coming Messiah for everlasting life but who did not yet know that Jesus is the Messiah in whom he had already believed. If this is correct, it would mean that the man was already born again before he met Jesus, and that here is a Johannine example, like John the Baptist earlier (1:33, “And I did not know Him”), of an OT saint coming to believe that Jesus is the Messiah in whom he had already believed (cf. Luke 2:25-38 re. Anna and Simeon). The way he handled himself before his inquisitors sounds like a man who was an OT saint who already knew that he had eternal life by faith alone in the Messiah alone” (in “John,” The Grace New Testament Commentary, revised edition [Denton, TX: Grace Evangelical Society, 2010, 2019], 205).
[16] Stegall, The Gospel of the Christ , 369.
[17] John Piper, The Future of Justification: A Response to N. T. Wright(Wheaton, IL: Crossway, 2007), 20.
[18] Ibid.
[19] Zane C. Hodges, “How to Lead People to Christ, Part 2,” JOTGES (Spring 2001): 17. The “excess baggage” of which Hodges spoke was things like asking a person to “pray a prayer, or make a decision for Christ, or do any of the many other things people often asked the unsaved to do” (p. 17).
[20] Franklin Johnson, “The Atonement,” p. 1, available at chrome-extension://efaidnbmnnnibpcajpcglclefindmkaj/https://goitrc.org/pdf/pdf_sermons/Sermon,ATONEMENT.pdf. Last accessed August 5, 2022.
[21] “The Ransom Theory” (unnamed author) available at https://www.ligonier.org/learn/devotionals/ransom-theory . Last accessed August 5, 2022.
[22] Ibid.
[23] Bob Wilkin, “Benefits of Christ’s Blood: Restricted and Unrestricted” JOTGES (Autumn 2009): 3-10. Available online at https://faithalone.org/journal-articles/benefits-of-christs-blood-restricted-and-unrestricted/.
[24] “Jesus the Evangelist” at https://www.christianstudylibrary.org/article/jesus-evangelist . Last accessed August 5, 2022.
[25] “Jesus the Great Evangelist: a sermon on John 4” at https://www.patheos.com/blogs/adrianwarnock/2014/02/jesus-the-great-evangelist-a-sermon-on-john-4/ . Last accessed August 5, 2022.
[26] Zane C. Hodges, The Hungry Inherit: Winning the Wealth of the World to Come (Corinth, TX: Grace Evangelical Society, 2016), 151, italics added.
[27] It is available as a free e-book at https://faithalone.org/ebooks/jesus-gods-prophet/ and a paperback version is available at https://faithalone.org/store/page/2/?filter_book-author=hodges&query_type_book-author=or .
John H. Niemelä
John 5:28-29 in Light of 5:24[1]
I. INTRODUCTION
Amen, amen, I tell you, the one who listens to My word and believes the One who sent Me has everlasting life, and does not come into judgment, but has passed from death to life (John 5:24).
Do not be shocked at this, because an hour is coming in which all those in the tombs will hear His voice and will come forth— those who have done good things, unto the resurrection of life; but those who have done substandard things, unto the resurrection of judgment (John 5:28-29). [2]
Those who interpret John 5:24 in light of 5:28-29 expect Jesus to summon all people (believers and unbelievers) to the Great White Throne (GWT). They regard verses 28-29 as universal. If that were actually so, John 5:24 would not promise believers an exemption from the summons to the GWT. It would only exempt them from eternity in the lake of fire.
By contrast, this article contends that John 5:24 promises that Jesus will not even summon believers to the GWT judgment. It goes without saying that they will never experience the lake of fire.
Most of Christendom understands John 5:24 as older editions of the King James Version [3] rendered it:
Verily, verily, I say unto you, He that heareth my word, and believeth on him that sent me, hath everlasting life, and shall not come into condemnation [i.e., the lake of fire]; but is passed from death unto life. ( emphasis added)
Unfortunately, such an understanding serves as a catalyst for most of Christendom imagining that a believer’s destiny is not settled until the final judgment. That is the polar opposite of John 5:24’s promise. This article categorically denies that believers will be at the GWT. Paraphrasing Shakespeare in Hamlet:
To be [at the GWT], or not to be [at the GWT]? That is the question .
Analysis will proceed under the following outline:
I. Hermeneutics and the order of operations.
II. John 5:24 as the great divide.
III. John 5:24 takes priority over 5:28-29.
IV. Three Grace views of 5:28-29.
a. Believing is the good that every believer has done.
b. The sinless regenerate-seed only does good.
c. Unbelievers doing good is hypothetical and impossible.
V. Proof that unbelievers doing good is hypothetical
and impossible.
a. The New Testament uses similar hypothetical arguments.
b. Unbelievers will be the last group to be resurrected.
c. “Hypothetical and impossible” is the simplest Grace view.
II. HERMENEUTICS AND THE ORDER OF OPERATIONS
Conflicting views of John 5:24 derive from opposed hermeneutical starting points. The following math problem illustrates:
4 + 1 × 3 = x
Should one add first or begin by multiplying? The results differ:
One student adds first (as if parentheses were around 4 + 1); the other multiplies first:
Addition First
Problem: 4 + 1 × 3
Interpretation: (4 + 1) × 3
Step 1: 5 × 3
Step 2: 15
Multiplication First
Problem: 4 + 1 × 3
Interpretation: 4 + (1 × 3)
Step 1: 4 + 3
Step 2: 7
Mathematicians follow this order of operations: P = parentheses, E = exponents, M/D = multiply (or divide), A/S = add (or subtract). The acronym is PEMDAS. The student on the left erred by ignoring PEMDAS. The one on the right followed PEMDAS, multiplying before adding. That led to the correct answer: 7, not 15. Even if 100% of a teacher’s students answered 15, it is still wrong.
Virtually all interpreters start with 5:28-29. They assume that everyone (believers and unbelievers) will appear at the GWT. Taking 5:28-29 to affirm that believers will be at the GWT would preclude 5:24 from excluding believers from that judgment. [4]
Reversing the order of operations (starting with 5:24) yields an entirely different result. Jesus promised that no believer will appear at the GWT. This precludes including believers among “those in the graves” (5:28) who would appear at the Great White Throne.
Will Jesus judge believers at the GWT? Or will only unbelievers appear there?
III. JOHN 5:24 AS THE GREAT DIVIDE
Why is 5:24 the great divide? Why not 5:28-29? Grace interpreters stand unified against the majority view of 5:24. Despite agreeing that 5:28-29 does not mean that believers appear at the GWT, they differ on the particulars of those verses. Thus, 5:24 is the dividing point. Sections III–IV of this article will focus on why 5:24 (not 5:28-29) is the starting point; sections V–VI will show that one Grace position on 5:28-29 is the most consistent with 5:24.
A 2013 book in Zondervan’s Counterpoints Series (Four Views on the Role of Works at the Final Judgment) [5] conveniently shows John 5:24 as the great divide. Each contributor to the Views book represents a segment of Christendom. Three writers (Calvinist Thomas Schreiner, Anglican James Dunn, and Catholic Michael Barber) prioritize 5:28-29, while Robert Wilkin emphasizes 5:24. The general editor, Alan Stanley, wrote the following summaries of each author’s view. The great divide in regard to John 5:24 is crystal clear:
Thomas R. Schreiner: Works will provide evidence that one actually has been saved: At the final judgment works provide the necessary condition, though not the ground for final salvation...
James D. G. Dunn: Works will provide the criterion by which Christ will determine eternal destiny of his people...
Michael Barber: Works will merit eternal life: At the final judgment, good works will be rewarded with eternal salvation…
Robert N. Wilkin: Works will determine rewardsbut not salvation: At the Judgment Seat of Christ each believer will be judged by Christ to determine his eternal rewards, but they remain eternally secure even ifthe judgment reveals they have failed to persevere in good works or in faith. [6]
Schreiner, Dunn, and Barber all surmise that believers will appear at the final (GWT) judgment. Wilkin does not. John 5:24 is a great divide within Christendom.
Each author wrote a main article, to which the others responded. Wilkin emphasizes the verse, mentioning it fourteen times, at least once in each essay. Schreiner and Dunn both mention it twice (but each only does so in a single essay); Barber avoids the verse entirely. [7]
|
John 5:24 Citations in Main Essays and Rebuttals |
|||||
|
Stanley |
Wilkin |
Schreiner |
Dunn |
Barber |
|
|
Main Essays |
|
|
|||
|
Introduction |
1 |
||||
|
Wilkin |
6 |
||||
|
Schreiner |
2 |
||||
|
Dunn |
— |
||||
|
Barber |
— |
||||
|
Conclusion |
1 |
||||
|
Responses: |
|||||
|
to Wilkin |
— |
2 |
— |
||
|
to Schreiner |
3 |
— |
— |
||
|
to Dunn |
1 |
— |
— |
||
|
to Barber |
4 |
— |
— |
||
|
Totals: |
2 |
14 |
2 |
2 |
0 |
Akin to Schreiner, Dunn, and Barber, some translations render John 5:24 as if it only promises that believers will not end up in the lake of fire. They express it with some variation of “will not be condemned,” “will not come into condemnation,” or “will not be found guilty.” [8] Instead, the promise is that believers will not even appear at the final (GWT) judgment. A great divide exists over the interpretation of John 5:24.
IV. PROOF THAT 5:24 TAKES PRIORITY OVER 5:28-29
John 5:22-30 has seven uses of the kri- family of words. Krinō (“to judge”) appears twice (5:22, 30), and krisis (“judgment”) has five uses (5:22, 24, 27, 29-30). Both John’s word choice and context are significant. [9] Each requires analysis.
A. John’s Word Choice
Both English and Greek add suffixes to nouns. For example, the English suffix -al refers to an action. Examples include “arrival,” “denial,” and “removal.” Likewise, the Greek suffix - sis generally focuses on actions, not results of those actions. The renowned grammarian James Hope Moulton concluded his analysis of noun suffixes by saying:
In the classical [pre-300 BC], and still more in the Hellenistic period [300 BC–AD 300], a differentiation of meanings was observed in the use of the several formations: -sis then expressed the verbal abstract [the verbal action]..., and -ma the result of the action... [10]
B. The Context of John 5:22-30
Six uses of the kri- family of words in John 5:22-30 set the pattern for 5:24. Analysis will begin with the verses in which a verbal form appears.
1. “Krinō” and “Krisis” in John 5:22
For the Father judges [krinō] no one, but He has granted all [execution of] judgment [krisis] to the Son.
The Father will not judge at the GWT but will delegate that to the Son.
Clearly, this speaks of people facing Jesus as Judge, i.e., the act of judging.
2. “Krinō” and “Krisis” in John 5:30
I can do nothing of Myself. As I hear, I judge[krinō], and My judgment [krisis] is righteous, because I do not seek My will, but the will of the Father who sent Me.
Again, this speaks of Jesus as Judge at the GWT.
3. “Krisis” in John 5:27
…and [the Father] has granted Him authority to execute judgment [krisin poieō], because He is the Son of Man.
Although krinō does not appear here, krisin poieō (“make judgment”) is equivalent. This follows the pattern.
4. “Krisis” in John 5:28-29
…an hour is coming in which all those in the tombs will hear His voice and [those raised from the tombs] will come forth— those who have done good things, unto the resurrection of life; but those who have done substandard things, unto the resurrection of judgment[krisis].
Consider the chronology for unbelievers here. They will rise, so Jesus can try them. Precisely, the phrase “resurrection of judgment” refers to being raised so they could appear at the GWT. Again, krisis refers to the act of judgment (the GWT), not to its result (the lake of fire).
5. “Krisis” in John 5:24
Amen, amen, I tell you, the one who listens to My word and believes the One who sent Me has everlasting life, and does not come into judgment[krisis], but has passed from death to life.
The other six uses of the kri- family of words in John 5:22-30 refer to the GWT. Everything in context points to krisis in 5:24 as a court appearance, not the lake of fire. Jesus promised that believers will not appear before Him as Judge.
6. Summary of Word Choice and John 5:22-30’s Context
Schreiner, Dunn, and Barber attempt the wrong order of operations in John 5:24 and 28-29. They ignore John’s choice of krisis (not krima), a word normally focused upon action, not result. Most of Christendom neglects the Biblical equivalent of PEMDAS (parentheses, exponents, multiply/divide, add/subtract). Bad hermeneutic leads to catastrophic results. A great divide ensues.
V. THREE GRACE VIEWS OF 5:28-29
Free Grace advocates agree that John 5:24 promises to exclude believers from the GWT. Despite unity there, three consistent Grace views of 5:28-29 exist, as Wilkin clarifies:
[B] This could be an example of Johannine use of absolute language. Positionally speaking, all believers are holy and sinless. [C] It is also possible that Jesus is pointing out the futility of salvation by works...
[A] Another view is that the reference to doing good alludes to believing in Jesus. [11]
This article will treat the views in the following order:
A. Believing is the good that every believer has done.
B. The sinless regenerate-seed only does good.
C. Doing good is hypothetical and impossible for unbelievers.
A. Believing Is the Good that Every Believer Has Done
The pertinent part of the passage reads:
…all those in the tombs will hear His voice and will come forth— those who have done good things, [12] to the resurrection of life…
John Hart is one of many holding this view. [13] He states it in a totally transparent way, even surfacing the key difficulty with the view:
In this passage, all Christians are considered to be those who did the good [ta agatha] deeds (v. 29), namely, they exercised faith in Jesus (see the contrast between believing and disobeying [the command to believe] in 3:36), and they will go to a resurrection of life. [14]
One difficulty here is that good ( things) is plural. Another is that believing is not something that a believer does; it is something that happens. A person is persuaded that Jesus guarantees him or her eternal life. Believing is not something that one does, but that one experiences. [15]
B. The Sinless Regenerate Seed Only Does Good
Again, the following is the portion of the passage which this view seeks to explain:
…all those in the tombs will hear His voice and will come forth— those who have done good things, to the resurrection of life…
Zane Hodges proposed the Sinless Regenerate Seed view in 1979. [16] He reiterated his argument in his commentary on John:
It is perfectly true that even after we are born of God, we continue to live in a sinful body that expresses itself all too often. But it is the unmistakable doctrine of the Apostle John that, in the final analysis, “whoever has been born of God does not sin, for His seed remains in him and he cannot sin because he has been born of God” [17] (1 John 3:9). This verse means exactly what it says, but of course it is the new person created by regeneration that “does not…and cannot sin.” [18]
Regarding 1 John 3:9, I concur that the sinless regenerate seed cannot sin. However, the difficulties with this understanding of John 5:29a seem insurmountable. John directs his gospel to unbelievers. Thus many [19] of his parenthetic asides assist unbelieving readers to understand difficult ideas. [20] In a book for unbelievers, would not John need to have added a parenthetic aside to clarify this result of regeneration? It seems far too advanced for unbelieving readers—without a parenthetic explanation. [21] Another solution is needed.
C. Doing Good is Hypothetical and Impossible for Unbelievers
Before I make a case for the view, a brief explanation of the passage under this model is appropriate. Again, the passage provides context for the analysis:
…all those in the tombs will hear His voice and will come forth— those who have done good things, to the resurrection of life…
A rewording of this passage may make the “hypothetical and impossible view” clearer.
At the GWT, any unbeliever who has lived an absolutely perfect life, consistently doing only perfect and good things, would receive eternal life while standing before the judge.
No unbelievers at the GWT will be found to have lived perfect lives meriting eternal life. Jesus did not predict that He will find any who did good. He will find none.
Chuck Swindoll offers some clarity on John 5:28-29:
Theoretically, a person can go to trial before the judge and, if he or she is found to be morally perfect, gain eternal life. However, in a practical sense, no one is morally perfect. Therefore, to face judgment without grace is to face condemnation. Consequently, Jesus uses the two ideas interchangeably; judgment is condemnation [e.g., reaching a verdict to condemn]. His point, then, is to avoid judgment altogether by grace that is received through belief. [22]
The analysis of the “hypothetical and impossible” offer will focus on three issues:
1. The New Testament uses similar hypothetical offers.
2. Only unbelievers will be in graves at the time of the GWT.
3. “Hypothetical and impossible” avoids a bait-and-switch.
1. The New Testament Uses Similar Hypothetical Offers
Although Zane Hodges did not accept the “hypothetical and impossible view” of John 5:28-29, he did so elsewhere. In fact, in 2005 or 2006, I told him my view of this passage. His first words were, “I, of all people, should hold your view.” He said this, because he is well-known for taking this approach in Rom 2:6-7:
In line with the teaching of the Gospel of John as well as Jewish thought in general, this future destiny is identified in terms of eternal life. God will certainly give it to any who deserve it by persisting in good work.
Unfortunately, no one does this. As Paul later makes quite clear, “There is none righteous, not even one. There is no one doing good, there is not so much as one” (Rom 3:10, 12). Yet the principle remains true that, if there were someone who did do good persistently, and who was indeed righteous, God would give him eternal life because of that. [23]
On the same page, Hodges sets forth Jesus proposing a hypothetical and impossible option to a lawyer:
When a specialist in the Jewish law (NKJV = “lawyer”) asked Him, “Teacher, what shall I do to inherit eternal life?” Jesus asked the counter question, “What is written in the law? What is your reading of it?” (Luke 10:25-26). The lawyer then proceeded to quote the two foremost commandments of the law, the commands to love God and neighbor. To this Jesus replied simply, “You have answered rightly; do this and you will live” (Luke 10:27-28). The problem was, of course, that neither the lawyer himself, nor anyone else (other than the Lord Jesus) has ever, or will ever, fulfill these two supreme commandments. [24]
Once again Jesus set a hypothetical and impossible option before someone in the hope that the hearer would recognize: “That’s impossible.” People who realize the impossibility of earning eternal life often become open to a gift by grace. In John 5, Jesus was confronted by religious leaders who wanted to kill Him because He told a man to pick up his mat (John 5:16). They demanded perfect adherence to their rules. Jesus sought to put His sandal on their foot—for them to realize that He, the Judge at the GWT, would demand perfection. They would be infinitely better off to accept His offer of life (5:24) than to face Him as judge (5:28-29). This is not the NT’s only use of a hypothetical and impossible offer.
2. Only Unbelievers Will Be in Graves at the Time of the GWT
As 1 Corinthians 15:22-23 notes, the resurrection of believers will occur in stages:
A. Church age believers will rise in the pretribulation Rapture.
B. Tribulation saints will rise for the start of the Millennium (Rev 20).
C. OT saints will have a role in the kingdom; they rise before the Millennium begins. [25]
D. Millennial saints who die will be part of the first resurrection. Their resurrection will be prior to the GWT. [26]
Who will still be unresurrected at the time of the GWT? Only
unbelievers will still be in tombs. Note that 5:28 speaks of “all those
in the tombs,” not “all those
who are
in the tombs.” Jesus did not say, “everyone who ever was in a tomb” will
participate in 5:28-29.
[27]
He spoke of those who would still be in tombs at the time of
the GWT. Thus, it is vital to remember that
the GWT is after the Millennium. Unbelievers
will be the sole participants.
3. Hypothetical Avoids a Bait-and-Switch
Whether one holds that believing is the good that every believer does (Grace view 1) or the sinless regenerate-seed approach (Grace view 2), both assume that Jesus asserts that believers will do good. Of necessity, both views see Jesus introducing the Bēma, at which believers’ works will be judged. Therefore, both views logically envisage Jesus saying in John 5:24, “Only unbelievers will be judged.” So far, so good. But only a few verses later, they imagine Jesus saying, “Unbelievers will be judged at the GWT; believers will be judged at the Bēma.” That creates a bait-and-switch.
View 3 avoids this difficulty. Only a tiny part of John 5 speaks of the promise of everlasting life for believers (5:21, 24-26, 40). On the other hand, 5:22-23 and 27-39, 41-47, warn them that rejecting Him will result in facing Him as judge. In verse 27, Jesus turns from a focus upon Himself as the life-giver to His role as their future judge at the GWT.
The topic in 5:28-29 does not include believers. The focus shifts to unbelievers at the GWT. In John 5:24, Jesus promised categorically that believers will not appear at the GWT, but in 5:28-29 He asserted that unbelievers certainly will be there.
Grace people need not struggle over an imaginary bait-and-switch. John 5 does not say, “Believers will not be judged [GWT], but believers will be judged [Bēma].” Rather, Jesus promised in 5:24 that believers will not be judged at the GWT, but 5:28-29 certifies that unbelievers will be judged there.
What is the appropriate response to an objector who asks whether the Bēma compromises the truth of 5:24? “Absolutely not.” The topic in this portion of John 5 is whether one will be judged at the Great White Throne. Jesus promised that believers will not be judged there, but unbelievers will. He said nothing about the Bēma here.
An illustration may help. My wife Diane and I purchased lifetime senior passes to U.S. national parks. They are not passes to any state, county, or municipal parks. We did not buy passes to every park everywhere. Similarly, Jesus did not offer exemption from all assizes, but to the one specific judgment that is a major focal-point in John 5.
View 3 allows saying that the only judgment in view is the GWT. Jesus said nothing here about believers doing good. Why not? Eternal life is a gift to believers. He spoke of the requirement that unbelievers would need to be perfect to merit eternal life. Believers receive eternal life without merit, so why would Jesus stipulate something about their doing good? Why would He hint at their facing a judgment (albeit a different one) in a context exempting them from the GWT judgment?
VI. CONCLUSION
We have seen that John 5:24 is the great divide in Christendom. Three scholars (Thomas Schreiner, James Dunn, and Michael Barber) represent the vast majority of those who call themselves Christian. They all regard John 5:24 as nothing more than a promise that believers will not be in the lake of fire.
Why? They and their compatriots ignore John 5’s order of operations (a Biblical counterpart to PEMDAS[28]). John 5:24 takes priority over 5:28-29, because verse 24 categorically promises that believers will not appear at the GWT. Therefore, 5:28-29 describes the judgment of unbelievers.
Grace people are clear on 5:24 but diverge in their approaches to 5:28-29. Some say that believing is the good thing that every believer does, but the verse speaks of having done good things (plural). Also, believing is not a thing done, but something experienced.
Other Grace people opt for the sinless regenerate seed, but that is a deep theological truth for a book designed for unbelievers. John typically adds parentheses to help unbelieving readers understand anything difficult. Though 1 John 3:9, indeed, speaks of this truth, John 5 certainly does not.
The final Grace position is that Jesus spoke hypothetically: If any unbeliever were absolutely perfect, He would not deny that person eternal life. No such unbelievers ever have or ever will exist. No one will receive eternal life through merit.
The arguments in favor of the “hypothetical and impossible offer view” are that Scripture uses such arguments elsewhere with unbelievers; the only ones still in the graves at the time of the GWT will be unbelievers; and this is the only Grace view that escapes the bait-and-switch.
How might one sum up the two passages?
Jesus promised that believers will not appear at the Great White Throne (5:24), but 5:28-29 guarantees that unbelievers will appear there to see if any reached perfection: the hypothetical and impossible requirement that an unbeliever would need to attain.
Copyright © John H. Niemelä 2022, reprinted 2023
[1] This article is reprinted from the Journal of the Grace Evangelical Society Autumn 2022 Volume 35/Number 69, 15-30. Dr. Niemelä has lightly edited it and then very graciously allowed TTVF Journal to reprint it.
[2] Unless otherwise noted, all NT citations are from the Faithful Majority Translation (FMT), copyrighted by John H. Niemelä. This is an in-process translation of the New Testament from the Majority Text.
[3] The New King James Version corrects the older versions here.
[4] Of course, no believer will go to the lake of fire. The crux is whether 5:24 promises more—that believers will not appear at the Great White Throne.
[5] Alan P. Stanley, general editor, Four Views on the Role of Works at the Final Judgment , Counterpoints Series: Bible and Theology, series ed., Stanley N. Gundry (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 2013).
[6] Stanley, The Role of Works , back cover, wrote all four statements to summarize each author’s view. Emphasis added.
[7] See Thomas R. Schreiner, “Justification Apart from and by Works at the Final Judgment Will Confirm Justification” in The Role of Works, 92-93; James D. G. Dunn, “If Paul Could Believe Both in Justification by Faith and Judgment according to Works, Why Should That Be a Problem for Us?” inThe Role of Works, 57-59.
[8] The KJV, NAB, NETB, NIRV, NLT, and Webster Bible are some that misinterpret the verse in this manner.
[9] John’s Gospel uses krima only once (9:39), speaking of judgment’s result, not the act.
[10] James Hope Moulton, Accidence and Word-Formation in James Hope Moulton and Wilbert Francis Howard, A Grammar of New Testament Greek , vol. 2, (Edinburgh, SCT: Clark, 1920), 355. Neither Moulton nor I claim that every occurrence of every - sis Greek noun refers to action, nor that every occurrence of every - sis noun refers to action, nor that every occurrence of every - ma noun refers to result. It is a general pattern. (Section IV-B of this article contends that the general pattern holds true here.) Romans 5:16 is an important exception, in which krima is an action (the verdict), while katakrima is the result (the judicial sentence).
The 160 NT - sis words follows [KRISISis capitalized]: agalliasis,aganaktēsis,ainesis,aisthēsis,anablepsis,anachusis,anadeixisanagnōsis,anairesis,anakainōsis,anakrisis,analēmpsis,analusis,anamnēsis,anapausis,anapsuxisanastasis,anesis,anoixisantapodosis,antilēmpsis,antithesis,apantēsis,apekdusis,aphesis,aphixisapochrēsis,apodeixisapokalupsis,apokatastasis,apokrisis,apolausis,apolutrōsis,apothesis,athetēsis,athlēsis,auxēsis,basis,bebaiōsis,biōsis,brōsis,chrēsis,deēsis,diagnōsis,diairesis,diakrisis,diēgēsis,dikaiōsis,diorthōsis,dosis,egersis,ekbasis,ekdikēsis,ekplērōsis,ekstasis,elegxiseleusis,endeixisendōmēsis,endusis,enteuxisenthumēsis,epanorthōsis,epignōsis,epilusis,epipothēsis,episustasis,epithesis,erēmōsis,exanastasis,genesis,gennēsis,gnōsis,hairesis,halōsis,halusis,hexishomoiōsis,horasis,hupantēsis,huparxishupokrisis,hupomnēsis,hupostasis,hupotupōsis,husterēsis,iasis,kakōsis,katabasis,katakrisis,katanuxiskatapausis,katartisis,kataschesis,kataskēnōsis,kathairesis,katoikēsis,kauchēsis,kausis,kinēsis,klasis,klēsis,koimēsis,kolasis, KRISIS,ktisis,kubernēsis,lēmpsis,lusis,lutrōsis,metalēmpsis,metathesis,morphōsis,nekrōsis,opsis,orexisosphrēsis,parabasis,paradosis,paraklēsis,paratērēsis,paresis,pepoithēsis,peripoiēsis,perithesis,phanerōsis,phasis,phronēsis,phusiōsis,phusis,poiēsis,pōrōsis,posis,praxisprognōsis,prophasis,proschusis,proskarterēsis,prosklisis,proslēmpsis,prothesis,ptoēsis,ptōsis,purōsis,rhusis,stasis,sumphōnēsis,sunantēsis,sunchusis,suneidēsis,sunesis,sunkatathesis,suzētēsis,tapeinōsis,taxisteleiōsis,tērēsis,thelēsis,thlipsis,zētēsis.
[11] Robert N. Wilkin, “John,“ The Grace New Testament Commentary, rev. ed., ed. Robert N. Wilkin (Denton, TX: Grace Evangelical Society, 2019), 192.
[12] “Good (things)” is plural in Greek, as is “worthless (things)” (5:29).
[13] I once held this view. It may be attractive but does not quite fit the passage.
[14] John F. Hart, “John” in The Moody Bible Commentary, Michael Rydelnik and Michael Vanlaningham, gen. eds. (Chicago, IL: Moody Publishers, 2014), 1622.
[15] Someone will object, “Believing is an active voice. Therefore, believing is an action done by people.” No, that is not the active voice’s only use. Daniel B. Wallace, Greek Grammar Beyond the Basics (Grand Rapids, MI: Zondervan, 1996), 411) defines simple active , “The subject performs or experiences the action. The verb may be transitive or intransitive. This [the subject performing or experiencing the action] is the normal or routine use, by far the most common [of the active]” (italics his; underlining mine).
Buist M. Fanning, Verbal Aspect in New Testament Greek, Oxford Theological Monographs (Oxford, ENG: University Press, 1990; reprint, Oxford, ENG: Clarendon, 2002), 135-36, names a category of verbs to which pisteuōbelongs, “Verbs of passive cognition , mental attitude or emotional state. No focus on exertion to maintain knowledge. Attitude or to act in keeping with it” [emphasis in original]. He then appended some verbs in that category. I started with his list, but (1) removed verbs lacking active forms, (2) added noeō, (3) added basic definitions, and (4) made pisteuōbold. His list appears on ibid ., 136; the resulting list follows:
agrupneō(to be alert); ginōskō(to know) [in present tense]; grēgoreō(to be alert); dokeō(to think); elpizō(to hope); exoutheneō(to disdain); epithumeō(to desire); euaresteō(to take delight); eudokeō(to take delight); thelō(to desire); katheudō (to sleep); kataphroneō(to despise); merimnaō(to be anxious); mimnēskō(to remember); mnēmoneuō(to remember); noeō(to perceive); nomizō(to think); oida(to know); pisteuō(to believe) ; prosdokaō(to expect); phroneō(to think).
Let me illustrate the upshot of the citations of Wallace and Fanning: “I know that I am writing this near Knoxville on a cool, breezy, and sunny summer morning with a few clouds.” My body detects the coolness. My knowledge of time (morning), place (near Knoxville), date (early summer), and weather (cool, sunny, with a few clouds) does not derive from action or decision, but from sensory perception and mental awareness. My knowledge (belief) concerning time, place, date, and weather is not an action.
Theodore Mueller, “Linguistic Nonsense about Faith,” Concordia Theological Quarterly 48 (January 1984): 61-66, has helpful analysis along the same lines.
[16] Zane C. Hodges, “Those Who Have Done Good—John 5:28-29; Part 6 of Problem Passages in the Gospel of John,” Bibliotheca Sacra 136 (April–June 1979): 163-64.
[17] See Zane C. Hodges, The Epistles of John: Walking in the Light of God's Love (Denton: Grace Evangelical Society, 1999), 140-44, for a presentation of the evidence for this view of 1 John 3:9.
[18] Zane C. Hodges, Faith in His Name: Listening to the Gospel of John (Corinth, TX: Grace Evangelical Society, 2015), 109.
[19] Clarifying difficulties is a common (but not the only) reason for parentheses. Often, they give emphasis.
[20] Merrill C. Tenney in “Footnotes of John’s Gospel” ( Bibliotheca Sacra 117 (October 1960): 364, lists 59 parenthetic asides in John. Gilbert Van Belle in Les parenthèses dans L’Évangile de Jean: Aperçu historique et classification texte grec de Jean , Studiorum Novi Testamenti Auxilia, ed. Frans Neirynck, vol. 11 (Louvain, BEL: University Press, 1985), 243-329, typed in the Greek text of John from Nestle26, adding parentheses and en-dashes (–) to mark both parentheses and parentheses within parentheses. Excluding parentheses within parentheses, I count 174 parentheses in Van Belle. John’s Gospel has at least 100 parentheses.
[21] John 7:39 illustrates clarifying parentheses, (“Now He said this about the Spirit, whom those who believe in Him were about to receive, for the Holy Spirit was not yet given because Jesus was not yet glorified.”)
[22] Charles R. Swindoll, John, Swindoll’s Living Insights New Testament Commentary (Carol Stream, IL: Tyndale House, 2014), 119. Unfortunately, Swindoll imagines (per his flowchart) that John 5:24 involves “all of humanity” facing “judgment before death κρίμα (krima).” This approach is from his mind, not from exegesis: (1) John 5:24 does not even use krima; (2) it speaks of believers avoiding krisis; (3) and 5:28-29 speaks of a judgment of those in graves, not a pre-death judgment. When Swindoll stays with the text, he is clear; when he strays, he gets lost.
[23] Zane C. Hodges, Romans: Deliverance from Wrath (Corinth, TX: Grace Evangelical Society), 63.
[24] Ibid., 63-64.
[25] Scripture does not say when they will rise, but it must be prior to the start of the Millennium.
[26] This is suppositional, since Scripture does not address this. However, I argue that no saints (of any dispensation) will be part of the GWT judgment, because John 5:24 is a trans-dispensational promise. It was true for the age of Israel believers (prior to Pentecost); it is true for church age believers; it will be true for believers under the return to the age of Israel during the Tribulation. How could this trans-dispensational truth be revoked for Millennial saints?
[27] Lest anyone go on autopilot—traditionally, people think of part of the passage speaking of the first resurrection and part about the second resurrection. If so, every human being would participate. Instead, the passage speaks only of unbelievers, so the participants would be the only ones unresurrected after the first resurrection is totally completed.
[28] Parentheses, exponents, multiplication/division, addition/subtraction (see the introduction to this article). When one violates the proper order of operations, wrong answers result.
by Lindsey Adkins
As born-again believers, the temptation to look at our good works can be overwhelming. The Apostle Paul instructs us to judge whether our works as believers are rewardable at the Bema Seat,[1]but nowhere are we told to look to our good works to know we are born again. Here are five good reasons to stop looking at our works to know if we have eternal life.
1. We are participating in pagan practices.
Christianity claims to be different than all other religions. And the way one obtains everlasting life is the defining characteristic that sets it apart.
In ancient Egypt it was taught that after death the person’s heart is weighed on a scale. If wickedness outweighed righteousness, then the demon god Ammit would devour the heart; the person suffers a second death, and ceases to exist. [2] The ancient Greeks held that upon death a person would go to one of three destinations dependent on what kind of life they lived. [3] In Hinduism, one is judged according to Karma. How good or bad a person lives, conditions how they will spend the next life. [4] All of these religions have something in common, a person’s level of good works, determines where they will go in the afterlife.
This common understanding of judgment after death has persisted throughout the ages. Accordingly, many within Christendom also believe that Jesus saves us, but if we want to go to heaven, then we must work together with Him and live a life characterized by good works. “If we want to go to heaven, then we must be good enough.” Sadly, this basic principle of the world (Colossians 2:20-23) continues to dominate much of Christendom.
The biblical view is fundamentally different and admits that our works don’t measure up. One sin is enough to tip the scales of righteousness (James 2:10). We are saved not by our own righteousness, but by grace through faith alone in Jesus alone (Ephesian 2:8-9). The way an ancient Egyptian might gain assurance, would be to evaluate his life’s practices (a sort of test run of what is to come), but for born-again believers in Christ assurance of eternal life comes not from the good works we do, like the ancient Egyptian, but from the promise we believe… hence the title believer.
If we say, we can know we are regenerate by our life’s practices, then we are saying that there is a subjective level of righteousness that proves objectively that we have eternal life while at the same time having to acknowledge the biblical truth that we are not good (no one is good but God). When we say, we can have assurance by looking at our works, this is just a clever way of saying my good outweighs my bad. We are no better than the Egyptians, Greeks or Hindus.
Christianity, in its biblical form, isdifferent. We know works matter because we understand the law of sowing and reaping, but we also know, when it comes to our good works, we can’t merit the gift of eternal life. We can’t measure up, and Jesus has to save us by grace. If we are weighing our works to see whether or not we have eternal life, it is because we don’t believe in Jesus for the life He so freely gives according to His promise. If that is the case, then like the pagans, we will be judged by our life’s practices and will be found wanting.
2. We are judging with subjective and unknowable standards.
According to Jesus’ promise, our assurance of eternal life is an objective truth (John 3:16, 4:10-13, 5:24, 6:47-48, 11:25-27), but we turn it into a subjective practice when we say a life characterized by good works and the relative absence of sin suggests regeneration. In contrast, Scripture presents eternal life as something we objectively know for sure (John 17:3; 1 John 5:13).
The Apostle John reminds us that we still sin (1 John 1:8), and the Apostle Paul, himself, struggled with the flesh (Romans 7:14-25). However, attempting to covertly qualify our sins as more or less acceptable, leads us to construct our own idea of sins God will allow, and one’s He won’t allow, based off our own judgements, biases, dispositions, and feelings. [5] Scripturally, any attempt to quantify an acceptable amount of sin is completely without support:
1:5 This is the message which we have heard from Him and declare to you, that God is light and in Him is no darkness at all.
1:6 If we say that we have fellowship with Him, and walk in darkness, we lie and do not practice the truth. (1 John 1:5-6)
Left to our own devises, the way we evaluate our works and sin for assurance of eternal life is a subjective pursuit in which only the self-righteous are assured. Even the great apostle to the Gentiles was forced to admit: O wretched man that I am! Who will deliver me from this body of death? I thank God—through Jesus Christ our Lord (Romans 7:24-25)!
Instead, evaluating our good works and sin reveals our inadequacy. This is the purpose of the Law. It is a mirror that reveals our imperfections, or a tutor to bring us to Christ (Galatians 3:24). Looking at our works for assurance of salvation, should lead us to a dead end. The exercise should be objective; we have sinned and fall short, which should lead us to look for a new solution. But, much like people Jesus encountered, we evaluate our works subjectively to determine if we have eternal life.
Consider the example of the rich young ruler. When Jesus confronts him with the Law, he responds, All of these I have kept from my youth. What do I still lack (Matthew 19:20)? This young man was religious. This is obvious with his response of claiming to keep the law. Being a religious Jew, he would have participated in the customary sin sacrifice. The young ruler was aware he had sinned; keeping this custom of sin sacrifice is an admission of sin. Yet, he believed that his life’s practices were good enough to be considered law abiding. Much like today, he viewed it as a characterization; he must try and live a life characterized by following the law, and the sin sacrifice would cover him when he did mess up and sin. God saves him, but he must do his part by living a life characterized by goodness; therefore, he asks what do I still lack (Matthew 19:20)?
He wasn’t understanding the purpose of the Law. Jesus’ answer, If you want to be perfect (Matthew 19:21), both exposes the route to salvation the young man had chosen (the works route), and shows him the impossible standard this path demands. Perfection was the very requirement the young man could never achieve. He was seeking glory, honor, and immortality (eternal life), by means of patient continuance in doing good (by keeping the law). And if this is the path he was taking, he had to be perfect. Looking at our works for assurance of salvation should lead us to Christ, not comfort in a vague subjective practice that falsely assures us of salvation.
Instead of following the example of the young rich ruler and being in the fog of subjectivity without knowing if we have the acceptable amount of good works and absence of sin in our lives to prove we have eternal life, we should always take Jesus at His word and believe the objective promise of God. Again, because we still sin, if left to our own, the way we evaluate our sin in the flesh will and (by nature) can only be subjective. We must therefore reject this practice, follow the Bible, and confess our sin.
1:8 If we say that we have no sin, we deceive ourselves, and the truth is not in us.
1:9 If we confess our sins, He is faithful and just to forgive us our sins and to cleanse us from all unrighteousness.
1:10 If we say that we have not sinned, we make Him a liar, and His word is not in us. (1 John 1:8-10)
Scripture tells us objectively that we know that we have eternal life, but fellowship and the abundant subjective experience of eternal life can be broken by sin in our lives… by failing to abide in Christ.
3. We are following in the footsteps of cults.
Undeniably many people in cults or non-Christian religions stay away from drugs, violence, immorality, and other vices. Many do good works; they can be hard-working, honest employees, give to the poor, and care for others with persistent outreach. They often help and love each other in their religious communities. Anyone, who has lived by a practicing Mormon family, can attest to this. They can look at the practices of their lives and measure up to (if not surpass) many Christians. Should this prove they are indwelt with the Holy Spirit? Should their transformed lives, and desire for holiness prove they have the right religion? Unfortunately for them it does. The frequent testimony of people in cults is that they were living bad lives, and then everything changed after they converted. Or, if they grew up in it, their testimony is that they always desired holiness.
The testimony of a Christian is different from the rest of the world’s religions. Our testimony is that we are not good. Our life’s practices don’t measure up, and that is why we need Jesus, the cross, and His promise of eternal life. Perhaps if a Mormon discovered he is actually lost in the fog of subjectivity and not assured of salvation, this would show him (or her) how fundamentally different our beliefs are. But If we tell a Mormon, that after we became a Christian, we stopped doing certain bad works and started to desire holiness, they can come right back and tell us the same thing. Our desires as people can change for many reasons. We can become sick of the consequences of sin, we can be convinced of a judgement to come, or we might like the feeling of doing what is right. And while it is beneficial in many ways to live a morally upright life, it doesn’t prove we have found the right beliefs, that we are born again, or even that we have believed the promise of eternal life. Our source of assurance comes, not from doing good, but from knowing with perfect assurance that Jesus and His promise of eternal life are true. This is our testimony.
4. We are not the “many” in Matthew 7:21-23.
Although Jesus provides us with an invaluable sneak peek into the plight of unbelievers at the Great White Throne judgment (Revelation 20:11-15), His warning in Matthew chapter 7 causes grave concern for some born-again believers:[6]
7:22 Many will say to Me in that day, “Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in Your name, cast out demons in Your name, and done many wonders in Your name?’
7:23 And then I will declare to them, “I never knew you; depart from Me, you who practice lawlessness!” (Matthew 7:22-23)
Like any fair judge, Jesus gives the many an opportunity to make their case. Their defense is in the form of a question, have we not prophesied in Your name, cast out demons in your name, and done many wonders in your name? Surely the miraculous nature of these good deeds are definitive “proof” of regeneration or eternal life.” The many point to their works and hope the Judge concludes that they must be one of His own, but He commands them to depart from Him.
Fortunately for us, Jesus already established: Not everyone who says to Me, “Lord, Lord,” shall enter the kingdom of heaven, but he who does the will of My Father in heaven (Matthew 7:21). You and I are not a part of the many. As believers in Jesus and His promise of eternal life, we have already done the will of the Father recorded in the one book designed to tell us how to enter the kingdom of heaven: This is the work of God, that you believe in Him whom He sent (John 6:29).
If Jesus turns away unbelievers who do good works, even dazzling signs in His name, why should we look to our good works for assurance of eternal life? Only when a person believes in Him whom He (the Father) sent do we have perfect assurance of eternal life.
5. We are not victims of a spurious faith.
Why would you and I think we have believed in Jesus when our lifestyle does not reflect Him? Put another way, how should we know if we are false converts or victims of a spurious faith except by looking at our good works? These kinds of questions bother many within Christendom.
Usually the term false convert is thrown around rhetorically to describe someone who has believed “defectively.” The typical narrative explains that the many may have believed in Jesus, but it was only intellectual assent. Because their head faith never manifests in the heart, their lives evidence a spurious faith. They do not have eternal life. They are not saved.
This is an unfortunate mistake. The idea of spurious faith is illogical. (A) cannot be (non-A). One is either convinced something is true, or is not convinced. We know a person can feign faith, where they say they believe, but are only pretending. A person can have misplaced faith, which is faith in the wrong thing. A person can also have faith that does not profit others. This is a person who believes, but fails to act on what he or she believes in a manner that blesses others. [7] But spurious faith or faith that is not faith is both unbiblical and logically impossible.
People can have a strong sense of assurance of salvation, but in fact be unregenerate. You and I may believe many things about Jesus, but if we have not believed in Jesus alone for the promise of eternal life, then any assurance of eternal life we have is based off of a false premise. We may do many good works, yet sadly not have eternal life. You and I can see the problem of gaining assurance of eternal life from our good works. But, if you and I believe Jesus when He promises us eternal life, then we have eternal life. Our faith is not spurious, but perfectly assured!
Enough Is Enough!
If for whatever reason, when we look to our works for assurance of eternal life, we are taking our eyes off of our Savior and His promise, and putting trust in ourselves and something that Scripture characterizes as filthy rags. How can you and I be assured by the filthy rags of our flesh if looking to our works for assurance keeps us from doing the one thing that Jesus requires of us to know for sure we have eternal life (1 John 5:9-13)? Born-again believers must continue believing what Jesus promises is true.
Jesus promises: For God so loved the world that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him should not perish but have everlasting life (John 3:16).
Jesus promises: Whoever drinks of this water will thirst again, but whoever drinks of the water that I shall give him will never thirst. But the water that I shall give him will become in him a fountain of water springing up into everlasting life (John 4:13-14).
Jesus promises: Most assuredly, I say to you, he who hears My word and believes in Him who sent Me has everlasting life, and shall not come into judgment, but has passed from death into life (John 5:24).
Jesus promises: And this is the will of Him who sent Me, that everyone who sees the Son and believes in Him may have everlasting life; and I will raise him up at the last day (John 6:40).
Jesus promises: Most assuredly, I say to you, he who believes in Me has everlasting life. I am the bread of life (John 6:47-48).
Jesus promises: I am the living bread which came down from heaven. If anyone eats of this bread, he will live forever; and the bread that I shall give is My flesh, which I shall give for the life of the world (John 6:51).
Jesus promises: I am the resurrection and the life. He who believes in Me, though he may die, he shall live. And whoever lives and believes in Me shall never die. Do you believe this (John 11:25-26; underlining added)?
Do you believe this(John 11:26)? Martha did: Yes, Lord, I believe that You are the Christ, the Son of God, who is to come into the world (John 11:27). Like Martha, do we believe Jesus and His promise to us and know that He alone is the Christ, the Son of God, who has given us eternal life? Enough is enough…let’s stand on the consistent promise of our Lord and Savior and know for sure we have eternal life!
Copyright © Lindsey Adkins 2023
[1] Examine yourselves as to whether you are in the faith. Test yourselves. Do you not know yourselves, that Jesus Christ is in you?—unless indeed you are disqualified (2 Corinthians 13:5). To be in the faith is to be in the race with the opportunity for reward at the Bema Seat. Those out of the faith are born-again believers who have been disqualified from running the race and gaining eternal reward. Unless otherwise noted all Scripture is from the New King James Version of the Holy Bible (Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson, 1982).
[2] “In the Hall of judgment, Ammit, “the eater of the dead” or “devourer,” waited impatiently at the feet of the scribe god Thoth, while the heart of the dead person was weighed in the one pan of the Great Balance. The other pan held an ostrich feather, the feather of Maat (truth). If the dead person’s deeds were pure, reverent, and honest, the heart and the feather balanced. In such a case,… the person should be spared and become one of the blessed dead. … If, however, the scales tipped, and the heart was heavier than the feather, the person was proved unworthy of eternal life. In that case, … Ammit … would eagerly devout it (heart), and the person would perish forever.” [https://kids.britannica.com/students/article/Ammit/309834#:~text=in%20ancient%20Egyptian%20religion%and,the%20hindquarters%20of%20a%20hippopotamus]
[3] “ Tartarus: This region is easily associated with Christianity’s Hell. This is where people were imprisoned and doomed to suffer the worst punishments for all of eternity. Asphodel Meadows: This is where the vast majority of deceased souls reside. This is an in-between place for souls who lived a mild life. Elysium:… this is the region of the Underworld where all mortals aspire to reside. Elysium is for the most heroic of mankind, and this is close to Christianity’s Heaven.” [https://www.joincake.com/blog/greek-afterlife/]
[4] “In Hinduism, one’s present state of existence is determined by his performance in previous lifetimes. The law of Karma is the law of moral consequence, or the effect of any action upon the performer in a past, a present or even a future existence… The goal of the Hindu is to achieve enough good karma to remove himself from the cycle of rebirths and achieve eternal bliss.” [Josh McDowell and Don Stewart, Handbook of Today’s Religions (Nashville, TN: Thomas Nelson, 1983), 289.]
[5] This can come from a misinterpretation of certain verses such as 1 Corinthians 6:9-10 or Galatians 5:19-21. These lists are naming the deeds the world practices and exhorting believers to remember that they are children of God. As children of God, it isn’t fitting of us to walk in the same deeds as unbelievers who cannot inherit the kingdom.
[6] For a more detailed exposition see: Lindsey Adkins, “The Most Terrifying Verse in the Bible?” The True Vine Fellowship Journal 2022 (Sequim, WA: TTVF, 2022), 13-20.
[7] A person who has dead faith is saved from the lake of fire, but their faith does not save them from a bad evaluation at the judgement seat of Christ (James 2:12-13).
Now That’s Good News… Now That’s Love!
By Frank Tyler
[Editor’s Note: The Beguelin Home Fellowship gathers for a breakfast fellowship, 10:00am on Fridays at Mariners Café in Sequim, Washington. We were studying the second volume of Come and See, Dr. Arnold Fruchtenbaum’s systematic theology, specifically the doctrine of the trinity, when one of the members of the fellowship asked two really good questions: “What is the relevance of a doctrine like the trinity to evangelism?” And secondarily, “If we are living in the end times when Jesus could come back at any moment, why spend our time on something that does not lead to opportunities to share the good news?” Both of these questions are excellent!]
Introduction
Although the Scriptures nowhere say that faith in the trinity saves anyone eternally, the Lord uses brothers and sisters, who understand doctrines like the trinity, to reach out powerfully with the good news. When Jehovah’s Witnesses go door to door sharing their faith, they attack the doctrine of the trinity in order to gain an audience for their message. Christians on the receiving end of their message are often unprepared and become flustered when defending their faith. However, those of us who are prepared and well-grounded in our understanding of this doctrine have a very unique opportunity to respond with love, gentleness, and grace—born of confidence and knowledge. Let us consider two approaches.
By Frank Tyler
[Editor’s Note: Few stories in the Gospel of John capture the imagination like the story of Nicodemus (John 2:23-3:21); few passages of Scripture are as important in understanding our salvation. As an evangelist I have always loved the story of Nicodemus, but was never comfortable with explanations of God’s love (John 3:16) that focus upon a New Testament or post-cross understanding. True, for you and I—with the events of the Jesus’ crucifixion and resurrection historically fulfilled on a brutal Roman cross—we cannot escape the conclusion of God’s sacrificial love… but prior to the cross, how would Nicodemus, a scholar schooled in the Torah, understand Jesus’ meaning when He says, For God so (in this manner) loved the world (John 3:16)? The answer lies in understanding Jesus’ apologia to Nicodemus and his disciples. Beginning in verse 3:14, Jesus takes them back in time to God’s deliverance of Israel from the fiery serpents (Numbers 21:4-9), to a timeless and well known theme, the unfailing loyal covenantal love or “chesed” of God (Psalm 136). From this referent, Jesus challenges Nicodemus and his disciples to understand the manner of God’s love in lifting up (3:14) or giving His Son (3:16). Jesus is the ultimate expression of God’s loyal covenantal love or “chesed” not just for Israel, but for the world, Jew and Gentile alike.
In a previously published article (Frank Tyler, John 3:16: The Manner of God’s Love, The True Vine Fellowship Journal 2018 (Sequim, WA: TTVF, 2018), 9-20), I wrote about the manner of God’s love in John 3:16. At that time, I understood Nicodemus as an unbeliever seeking Jesus out at night. This current article corrects my misunderstanding: Nicodemus and his disciples come to the light of God’s revelation: 1) that Nicodemus, as a new believer (John 2:23-25), might better understand what has transpired in his own life and 2) that his disciples might hear the good news from Jesus, Himself. Nothing refreshes the soul and mind like the correction of the Lord in His word. I hope you are as refreshed as I am!]
HEBREWS CHAPTER 6
By Ken W. Yates
[Editor’s Note: Few books in the New Testament create as much tension for believers as the book of Hebrews. Yates, himself, openly acknowledges: “It is ironic that the book I once dreaded and avoided has become a source of comfort and motivation. Hebrews does not threaten the Christian with the loss of salvation. Instead, it greatly encourages believers to remain faithful to the Lord in the midst of this fallen world in which we live. Grace will do that… If you are now looking for the strength and motivation to serve the Lord and please Him, the Book of Hebrews is for you. We will be His partners forever, if we persevere.” (Ken Yates, Hebrews: Partners with Christ (Denton, TX: Grace Evangelical Society, 2019), 9-10.)]
The Third Warning Passage
As previously mentioned, 5:11-14 introduces the third warning passage in the Book of Hebrews. In those verses the author specifically says that the readers have failed in their Christian living because they have not gone on to maturity. Here in Chap. 6 the author tells them to press on to such maturity (6:1-3), what will happen if they fall back (6:4-8), and then gives them another call to hold fast to their hope (6:9-12). At the end of the chapter, he concludes this warning.
Go on to Maturity (6:1-3)
By Bob Wilkin
[Editor’s Note: As director and founder of the Grace Evangelical Society, Bob Wilkin consistently defends the freeness of eternal life and costliness of discipleship. He has allowed TTVF to reprint this short, but insightful article.]
I still use the expression saving faith occasionally since it saves a lot of space. By saving faith, I mean faith in the saving object, the gift of God (everlasting life, John 4:10, 14; Eph 2:8) given by the Messiah Giver Jesus (John 4:25- 26; 6:47).
But what is faith? It probably is no surprise to you that most Evangelicals today do not believe that faith is persuasion. Indeed, many ridicule the idea that saving faith is merely being convinced of the saving truth.
Please take a moment and put down on paper in 25 words or less what faith is. All done? Here is what most Evangelicals today say.
One leading pastor and theologian defines faith in this way: “Receiving Christ as your supreme Treasure is what faith is,” and “An essential element of saving faith is treasuring Christ above all things,” and “Faith includes the embrace of Jesus as our all-satisfying Treasure.” [1]